Politics in Innovation: Power Relationships in the Mobilization of Support in Developing an Innovation Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2018.0160.161-186Keywords:
Innovation politics, teknokrasi, the power relationAbstract
Innovation policy is better understood as a question of the ‘novelty’ of ‘acceptance’ which is characterized by an emphasis on technocracy. Ironically, because of the novelty, the sustainability ofinnovation is not anticipated well, and the ability ofinnovators to
bequeath the institutional innovations is barely available. This study intends to reveal the problem. The emphasis on the aspects oftechnocracy in the discussion ofinnovationis not well explored. The problem is examined using the descriptive-exploratory approach
with the intentionto excavate and interpret objectively the real conditions against the practices of innovation policy. This study focuses on innovation policy in the field of service permissions in Sragen. Data were taken from interviews among the Governors, bureaucrats,board members and various parties concerned. Data analysis was performed using two methods: triangulation and interpretive.This study argues that in order for policy innovation to be successful, it has to be acceptable and sustainable where innovators must build relationships with various parties. It is further recommended that the form and relation ofthe innovation policy be studied more together with other models of bureaucratic innovation.
References
Albert, Mathieu and Suzanne Laberge (2007), The Dissemination and Legitimation Processes of the Innovation System Approach: The Case of the Canadian and Quebec Science and Technology Policy, Source: Science, Technology, & Human Values, vol. 32, no. 2 (Mar. 2007), pp. 221-249 Published by Sage Publications, Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/29733981. Accessed: 03/08/2012 20:48
Ansell, c., & Gash, a. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543 – 571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
Bains,W.(2009). Leadership and innovation. How consensus management blocks genuine Innovation, Bioscience Hypotheses. 2 (5) (2009): 277 – 28
Blanchard, k. h., Zigarmi, d., & Nelson, r. b. (1993). Situational Leadership ® After 25 Years: A Retrospective. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(1), 21 – 36. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179199300100104
Bryson, j. m., & Crosby, b. c. (2014). Public Value Governance: Moving beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74, 445 – 456. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12238.Public
Brown, K., & Osborne, S. P.(2012). Managing change and innovation in public service organizations. Routledge
Budiarjo, M. (1984). Various thoughts about power and authority. The Publisher of the Sinar Harapan, 1984-Indonesia-208 pages. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Aneka_pemikiran_tentang_kuasa_dan_wibawa.html?id=TRYkAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
Conger, j. a., Kanungo, r. n., & Kanungo, r. n. (2016). Toward a Behavioral Theory of Charismatic Leadership in Organizational Settings Published by: Academy of Management Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258069 Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: Toward a Behavioral Theory of, 12 (4), 637 – 647.
Darmawan, i. (2011). E-Government: A Preliminary Study In Sragen Regency. Proceedings of the national symposium on Autonomous Regions, (1), 69 – 75.
Deiss, k. j. (n.d.). Innovation and Strategy: Risk and Choice in Shaping User-Centered Libraries Strategy and Innovation: Building a Twenty-First-, 53(1), 17 – 32.
Fimm, j. m. (2000). Innovation Strategies in Australian Local Government. AHURI Research Paper, 1-32. Retrieved from http://www.ahuri.edu.au/downloads/publications/occasional_paper_4.pdf
Fisipol University. (n.d.). Seminars & workshops.
Foucault, m. (1971). L'Ordre du discours, 82. Retrieved from http://www.lavoisier.fr/livre/notice.asp?ouvrage=1930468
Foucault, m. (1994). Ethics: The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954-1984, Volume 1. The effects of a brief mindfulness intervention on acute pain experience: An examination of individual difference (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Glynn M. A. (1996). Innovative Genius: A Framework for Individual and Organizational Intelligence Relating to Innovation, The Academy of Management Review, vol. 21, no. 4 (Oct. 1996), pp. 1081-1111 Published by Academy of Management Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/ stable/259165. Accessed: 15/05/2012 10:29
Graeff, c. l. (1983). The Situational Leadership Theory: A Critical View. Academy of Management Review, 8(2), 285 – 291. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1983.4284738
Henning R (1963) Planning, organizing and Managing Change, Good Governance, Training Board, Luton in the Seminar and Workshop Proceedings, Breakthrough & Innovation management of the public service, the National Forum For the renewal of the Government AreaFisipol Government Science, Department of Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, 28-29 September 2005.
ISO, i. p. (2018). خدمات مشاوره ای در حوزه های مرتبط با مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات Itil, Cobit, Iso 20000 و planning Prince2 شرکت رایزن سامانه گستر, 3 – 5. Retrieved from http://rayzansamaneh.com/
Kumorotomo, w. (2012). The Failure Of The Implementation Of E-Government And Unproductive Activities With The Internet. The Website, (December), 2 – 10. Retrieved from http://kumoro.staff.ugm.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/Kegagalan-penerapan-egov.pdf
Lewin, k. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. The Journal of Heredity. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649489
Lewin, K. 1951, Field theory in social science; selected theoretical papers. D. Cartwright (Ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
Lewin, Kurt. 1973. Group Dynamics and Social Change; Source, Patterns, and Consequences by Eva Etzioni Halevy and Amitai Etzioni (eds). New York; Basic Books.
McHoul, A., & Grace, W.(2015). AFoucault primer: Discourse, power and the subject. Routledge.
Prasojo, e., & Kurniawan, t. (2008). The reform of the bureaucracy and Good Governance: the case of Best Practices from several regions in Indonesia. Symposium A Quarterly Journal In Modern Foreign Literatures, 1 – 15. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&cluster=360656420083251686&btnI=1&hl=id
Silvia, c., & Silvia, c. (2018). Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: Concepts for Successful Network Leadership, 43(1), 66 – 71.
Skogen, Kjell. (2010). Innovation for Inclusion introduction to the process of change, (http://www.idp-europe.org/indonesia/buku-inklusi/pdf/17-Inovasi_Inklusi.pdf), download January 19, 2010.
Skogen, Kjell. 1997. An Introduction to the Process of Innovation. Chapter II in-DSSI project. Socrates Programme 25234-CP-1-96-NO-ODL (dssi/http://www.uoc.es/), August 2, 2012, 20.00 Hours
Vigoda, e. (2002). From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527 – 540. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00235
Uphoff, Norman. 1986. Institutional Local Development; An Alatical Sourcebook. West Hartford. Kumarian Press.
Zimmer, s. (2015). Innovation Leadership. Research Starters. Retrieved from http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/detail/detail?sid=426aa88f-2250-469b-a34b-2e9350bd34b5%40sessionmgr110&vid=8&hid=117&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3D#db=ers&AN=108690514
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.
