Innovation Process in Public Service: Studying Innovation Process in Yogyakarta City Licensing Service Clinic Unit (KLIPPER)

Authors

  • M. Rizki Pratama Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2018.0249.250-268

Keywords:

Innovation, innovation process, public service innovation, licensing innovation

Abstract

To date on Indonesia’s government performance, innovation agenda has encouraged public’s hope as bureaucracy reformation has been closer to policy failure. Innovation becomes a trend to make public’s ends meet, mainly innovation which is introduced by local governments. As the most innovative local governments, Yogyakarta City, has proceeded many thrive innovations from their local agencies such as Yogyakarta City Licensing Service Office. For long time, the office is recognized  as good practice of public service provision in Indonesia.  At that case, it can be assured through Licensing Service Clinic Unit (KLIPPER) innovation which gains considerable advantages, both internal and external stakeholder. KLIPPER is a licensing consultation program for investors who will make complex building construction permits. Furthermore, KLIPPER improves both license output and law-abiding performances. This study explores process behind innovation. It is prominent objective because scholars have argued innovation process as a blackbox and a conundrum.  We applies innovation process theory which separates to the threefold linear stages of the  procesess (initiation, implementation and diffusion). This study used qualitative approach to interpret involved actor’s experiences in innovation process. Finally, the study sums up that innovation is an evident work, it is not an accidental action because it can be traced back through to the dramatic steps, consequently it could be proposed as a framework to carry out innovative program for the others local governments agencies.

References

Ashworth, R., Boyne, G., & Entwistle, T. (2010). Public Service Improvement: Theories and Evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.

Bappenas. (2013). Evaluasi Kebijakan Reformasi Birokrasi. Jakarta: Bappenas.

BKPM, & KPPOD. (2009). Survei Kabupaten/Kota Terbaik di Indonesia untuk Bidang Pe-layanan Penanaman Modal Tahun 2009. Jakarta: BKPM-KPPOD.

Borins, S. (2002). Leadership and innovation in the public sector. Leader-ship & Organization Development Journal, 23(8), 467–476. http://doi.

org/10.1108/01437730210449357

Brata, R. A. (2014, January 8). Reformasi Birokrasi Pemerintah Daerah. Jawa Pos.

Chung, G. H., & Choi, J. N. (2016). Innovation Implementation as a Dynamic Equilibrium : Emergent Processes and Divergent Outcomes. Group & Organization Man-agement. http://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116645913

Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation : A Systematic Review of the Literature Mary M.

Crossan and Marina Apaydin. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6). http://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x

Daft, R. L. (1978). a Dual-Core Model of Organizational Innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6).

Damanpour, F. (2014). Footnotes to Research on Management Innovation. Organization Studies, 35(9).

Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations : Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers 1. British Academy of Management, 17, 215–236. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00498.x

Dewett, T., Whittier, N. C., & Williams, S. D. (2007). Internal Diffusion: the Conceptualizing Innovation Implementation. Competitive Review, 17(1/2).

Dwiyanto, A. (2008). Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation and its Contribution to Improvement: a Review for Policy-makers, Policy Advisers, Managers and Researchers. London: Institute of Governance and Public Management.

Hartley, J. (2015). Eight-and-A-Half Propositions to Stimulate Frugal Innovation in Public Service. In J. Wanna, L. Hsu-Ann, & S. Yates (Eds.), Managing under austerity: deliv-ering under pressure (pp. 139–156). Canberra: ANU Press.

Hartley, J., Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative Innovation: A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830. http://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136.Collaborative

Irawanto, D. W., Ramsey, P. L., & Tweed, D. M. (2013). Paternalistic Relationship: Authen-city and Credibility as a Source of Healthy Relationships. The Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 6(1).

Jappinen, T. (2015). How to Manage a Service Innovation Process in the Public Sector: From Co-Design to Co-Production. In R. Agarwal, W. Selen, G. Roos, & R. Green (Eds.), The Handbook of Service Innovation (pp. 707–726). London: Springer Verlag.

Jong, J. De, & Hartog, D. Den. (2010). Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36.

http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x

JPIP. (2013). Studi Keberlanjutan Inovasi dan Praktik Baik Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota Peraih Otonomi Award di Jawa Timur (2004-2013). Surabaya: JPIP.

Keys, P. R. (2008). Administration in Social Work Administrative Entrepreneurship in the Public Sector. Administration in Social Work, 12(2), 37–41. http://doi.org/10.1300/ J147v12n02

Kim, Y. (2010). Stimulating Entrepreneurial Practices in the Public Sector: the Roles of Organizational Characteristics. Administration and Society, 42(7).

Klein, K. J., & Knight, A. P. (2005). Innovation Implementation: Overcoming the Challenge. Current Direction In Psychological Science, 14(5).

Miles, M. J., & Huberman, M. A. (1992). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber tentangMetode Baru. Jakarta: UI Press.

Mintrom, M., & Luetjens, J. (2016). Design Thinking in Policy Making Processes: Opportunitiesand Challenges. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 0(0), 1–12.

Osborne, S. P. (1998). Voluntary Organizations and Innovation in Public Services. London:Routledge.

Osborne, S. P., & Brown, K. (2005). Managing Change and Innovation in Public Service Organizations. New York: R.

Patton, M. Q. (2009). Metode Evaluasi Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rasmussen, L., & Hall, H. (2016). The adoption process in management innovation : A Knowledge Management case study. Journal of Information

Science, (June 2015). http://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515625032

Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovation. New York: The Free Press.

Setiadi, R. (2009, December 17). Investment Award untuk Kota Yogyakarta: Kinerja Birokrasi atau Kepala Daerah. Radar Jogja.

Storey, C., & Khan, K. B. (2016). The Role of Knowledge Management Strategies and Task Knowledge in Stimulating Service Innovation. Journal of Service Research, 13(4).

Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (2016). Enhancing Public Innovation by Transforming Public Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

UNfGI. (2013). Database Good Practice. Retrieved from www.igi.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/index. php/id/database-good-practice

Wanna, J., Hsu-Ann, L., & Yates, S. (2015). Managing under austerity: delivering underpressure. Canberra: ANU Press.

Widaningrum, A., & Park, J. (2011). Governance Reform in Indonesia and Korea: Comparative Perspective. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Wolfe, R. A. (1994). Organizational innovation: review, critique and suggested research directions. Journal of Management Studies, May).

World Bank. (2006). Inovasi Pelayanan Pro-Miskin: Sembilan Studi Kasus di Indonesia. Jakarta: World Bank.

World Bank, & IFC. (2012). Doing Business di Indonesia 2012. Washington DC: World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-30

Issue

Section

Articles