Women Workers Resistance Against Elite Class Hegemony in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2018.0057.27-55Keywords:
hegemony, women labor, social movementAbstract
This study describes the women carrier labor resistance movement in Yogyakarta towards the dominance and hegemony done by other classes in the social structure of the market environment. This study uses a qualitative method with phenomenological approach and data analysis refering to the concept of qualitative data analysis. The results showed that the social structure in a market environment puts the women in the lowest social class and becoming the most effective tool in pursuing the domination and hegemony of the dominant actors. As a result, the market does not provide space for women workers to participate in the production process. They can not play a role in the social change because their position can only be regarded as a second class causing the increasingly unequel gap between the social classes. These conditions can then encourage the emergence of the women carrier labor activists to reduce disparities through alternative media.
References
Absar, Syeda Sharmin. (2003). Health hazards and labour laws in Bangladesh: a narrative-based study on women garment workers. Asian Journal of Social Science, 31, pp. 452.
Al-Jabiri, Muhammad Abed. (2009). Democracy, Human Rights and Law in Islamic Thought. London: I.B. Tauris Publishers In Association With The Centre for Arab Unity Studies.
Altheide, D. (1984). Media Hegemony: A Failure of Perspectiv. Public Opinion Quarterly. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48(2), 476-490.
Aprianto, Tri Chandra. (2008). Wajah Prakarsa Partisipatif: Dinamika Gagasan reforma Agraria dan Gerakan Sosial di Indonesa Pasca 1998. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 12(1), 25-39.
Arifin, Syarif, et al. (2012). Memetakan Gerakan Buruh: Antologi Tulisan Perburuhan Mengenang Fauzi Abdullah. Depok: Kepik.
Birowo, Mario Antonius. (2004). Melawan Hegemoni Media dengan Strategi Komunikasi Berpusat pada Masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(1), 37-72.
Eldridge, Philip. (2008). Development, Democracy and Non-Government Organizations in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Political Science, 4(1), 17-35.
Fakih, Mansour. (1996). Analisis Gender dan Transformasi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Faturochman. (1998). Deprivasi Relatif: Rasa Keadilan dan Kondisi Psikologis Buruh Pabrik. Jurnal Psikologi, 2, 1-15.
Habibi, Muhtar. (2013). Gerakan Buruh Pasca Soeharto: Politik Jalanan di tengah Himpitan Pasar Kerja Fleksibel. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. 16(3), 200-216.
Hambra, Makinnuddin Al. (2002). Polarisasi (Gerakan) Buruh: Momentum Negara untuk Menekan Upah. Jurnal Analisis Sosial, 7(1), 37-50.
Haryanto, Siti Mauliana Hairini and Abu Bakar. (2013). PKBI: Aktor Intermediary dan Gerakan Sosial Baru. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 16(3), 187-199.
Hatmoko, Mahadi Dwi and Sumartini, et al. (2013). Hegemoni Moral Nyai Kartareja terhadap Srintil dalam Novel Jantera Bianglala Karya Ahmad Tohari: Kajian Hegemoni Gramsci. Jurnal Sastra Indonesia Unnes. 2(1), 1-10.
Hendarto, Heru. (1993). Mengenal Konsep Hegemoni Gramch. Diskurus Kekuasaan dan Kemanusiaan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka.
Huesca, R. (1995). Subject-Authored Theories of Media Practice: The case of Bolivian tin miners radio. Communication Studies 46(3-4), 149-168.
Jailani, M.Syahran. (2013). Ragam Penelitian Qualitative (Ethnografi, Fenomenologi, Grounded Theory, dan Studi Kasus). Edu_Bio|Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 4, 41-50.
Kim, Sunhyuk. (2014). NGOs and Social Protection in East Asia: Korea,Thailand and Indonesia. Asian Journal of Political Science, 23(1), 23-43.
Lahoti, Rahul and Swaminathan, Hema. (2015). Economic Development and Women’s Labor Force Participation in India. Feminist Economics. 22(2), 168-195.
Maran, Yohanes Laba and Tadjudin Noer Effendy. (2006). Dominasi dan Hegemoni Kekuasaan Negara dan Bisnis Terhadap Petani (Studi tentang Produksi dan Distribusi Jambu Mete di Desa Baluk Hering, Kecamatan Tanjung Bunga, Flores Timur, Nusa Tenggara Timur). Sosiosains, 19(1), 115-142.
Martin, Roderick. (1990). Sosiologi kekuasaan. Jakarta: Rajawalo Pers.
Misel, Robert. (2004). Teori Pergerakan Sosial. Yogyakarta: Resist Book
Moelyarto. (1987). Politik Pembangunan sebuah Analisis Konsep, Arah dan Strategi. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Muhtadi. (2014). Jaminan Pekerja Rumah Tangga Dalam Hukum Internasional. Monograf, 119-126.
Mukhammad Riza A.V and M. Arif Affandi. (2015). Gerakan Perlawanan Serika Buruh dalam Sistem Outsourcing dan Sistem Pengupahan di PT Japfa Comfeed Sidoarjo. Paradigma. 3(1), 1-8.
Mulyani, Leni Widi. (2014). Problematika Pekerja Rumah Tangga dalam Hal Kelayakan Bekerja Berdasarkan Konvensi ILO Nomor 189 Tentang A Decent Work For Domestic Worker. Jurnal Clinical Legal Education. 17-37.
Morrell, Elizabeth. (2010). Local Agency and Region Building in Indonesia’s Periphery: Shifting the Goalposts for Development. Asian Journal of Political Science, 18(1), 48-68.
Nurkhalis. (2013). Hegemoni Barat dan Islam Terhadap Estimasi HAM. Jurnal Substantia, 15(1), 26-40.
Nyman, Roseline. (1997). Labour Reform: Addressing Women’s Needs?. Agenda: Empowering Women for Gender Equity. 13(35), 6-17.
Parfitt, Steven. (2016). A Nexus between Labour Movement and Labour Movement: the Knights of Labor and the Financial Side of Global Labour History. Labor History, 58(3), 288-302.
Patria, Nezar and Andi Arief. (1999). Negara dan Hegemoni. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.
Pattenden, Jonathan. (2016). Working at the Margins of Global Production Networks: Local Labour Control Regimes and Rural-Based Labourers in South India. Third World Quartely, 37(10), 1809-1833.
Pichardo, Nelson A. (1997). New Social Movements: A Critical Review. Annual review Sociology, 23, 411-430.
Raditya, Michael HB. (2015). Kontestasi Kekuasaan dan Keteladanan Semu di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 19(1), 1-16.
Setiawan, Fredy Nugroho. (2015). Hegemoni dan Dominasi Perusahaan Semen Terhadap Penduduk di Wilayah Pembangunan Pabrik Semen dalam Samin vs Semen. Jurnal Unimus. 6(1), 39-53.
Simon, Roger. (2004). Gagasan-gagasan Politik Gramsci. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Singh, Rajendra. (2001). Social Movements, Old and New, A Post-modernist Critique. New Delhi: Sage Publication.
Soekanto, Soerjono and Agus Brotosusilo. (1987). Masyarakat dan kekuasaan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sudibyo. (1998). Cerpen Saran “Groot Majoor” Prakoso Karya Y.B. Mangunwijaya: antara Hegemoni dan resistensi. Humaniora, 9, 1-9.
Sugiarti, Keri Lasmi. (2001). Sistem Kerja Borongan Pada Buruh Pemetik Teh Rakyat dan Negara. Jurnal Analisis Sosial. 7(1), 111-134.
Suharko. (2006). Gerakan Sosial Baru di Indonesia: Repertoar Gerakan Petani. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 10(1), 1-34.
Suwignyo, Andito. (2008). Buruh Bergerak : Membangun Kesadaran Kelas (Edisi Revisi). Friedrich Ebert Stiftung; Jakarta.
Turatmiyah, Sri and Annalisa Y. (2013). Pengakuan Hak-Hak Perempuan Sebagai Pekerja Rumah Tangga (Domestic Workers) Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Menurut Hukum Positif Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. 13 (1), 49-58.
Van Klinken, G. (2007). Perang Kota Kecil. Jakarta: KITLV-Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Weber, Max. (1997). The Theory of Social and Economic Organisation. A.M. Handerson. New York: Oxford University Press.
Windhu, I. Marsana. (1992). Kekuasaan dan Kekerasan menurut Johan Galtung. Yogyakarta: Kanisius. 30.
Wirahyoso, Bambang. (2002). Upah Minimum bagi Buruh dan Strategi Perjuangan Serikat Pekerja/Serikat Buruh. Jurnal Analisis Sosial. 7(1), 77-94.
Yayasan Annisa Swasti.
Yuliantoro, Nur Rachmat. (2005). Hegemoni Amerika Pasca 11/9: Menuju Sebuah ‘Imperium Amerika Baru’?. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. 9(1), 91-112.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.
