The Practices of Political Patronage and Clientelism of the Democrat Party in the 2014 Legislative Election in Ponorogo Regency

Authors

  • Haidar Fikri Public Administration Master, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences Sebelas Maret University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2017.0056.467-492

Keywords:

Clientelism, legislative elections 2014, patronage, warok

Abstract

The Democrat Party in Ponorogo Regency still exists despite cases of corruption that ensnared some national political actors. The Ponorogo Regency attracted the attention of many parties and candidates, including that of the Democratic Party, during the legislative elections in 2014. This concern included candidate efforts to transform the party through the provision of patronage material in diverse forms such as a unique distribution process, and a variety of patronage models. This research was conducted to determine the practice of patronage politics of the Democrat Party in the Ponorogo Regency in 2014. The theory used for this research on the practice of patronage is the theory of patronage and clientelism according to the variables offered by James Scott. The qualitative research methods are data collection interviews, and documentation and re- ports related to the elections in Ponorogo. The results of this study suggest that the practice of patronage in Ponorogo conducted by the Democrat’s candidate is very diverse, ranging from the use of money given to voters, the provision of public goods targeting social groups such as farmers and youth organizations on the assumption that they were impressionable on an emotional level, and giving pork barrels in the form of road construction and irrigation disbursed through the BKAD (Inter-agency Cooperation Board). Patronage is certainly dis- tributed through clientelism networks such as successful teams that have been prepared since before the election, a network of social groups that utilize a warok, considered a person who has a wise and exalted nature and takes advantage of the village elite. This is a political machine that runs a network to help distribute patronage so that it becomes clientelistic. The interest of this study is the associa- tion between patronage and clientelism that is fused with the local culture of the Ponorogo community and was mobilized in the legislative election in 2014.

References

Arriola,L. R.(2009). Patronage and political stability in Africa. Comparative Political Studies, 42 (10),1339–1362.10.1177/0010414009332126 http://cps.sagepub.com hosted at http://online.sagepub.com

Aspinall,E.(2014). Parliament and patronage. Journal of Democracy ,25(4),96–110.| 10.1353/jod.2014.0070

Aspinall, E. (2014). When brokers betray clientelism: Social networks, and electoral politics in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies,46(4), 545–570.

Aspinall, E. and Mada Sukmajati (Eds.). (2015). Politik Uang di Indonesia; Patronase dan Klientelisme pada Pemilu Legislatif 2014. Yogyakarta: PolGov.

Aspinall,E., Davidson,M.W.,A., Weiss,M. L.(2016). Local machines and vote broker agein the Philippines. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs,38(2), 191–196.

Auyero, J.(2000). The logic of clientelism in Argentina: An ethnographic account. Latin American Research Review,35(3),Arts & Humanities Database pg. 55.

Buquet, D.,&Pi~ neiro, R.(2016). Uruguay’s shift from clientelism. Journal of Democracy,27(1),

Hachemaoui, M. (2013).Clientélismeetpatronage dansl’Algérie contemporaine. Clientelismand pa-tronage in contemporary Algeria. Karthala-IREMAM , 205 pages. 19.

Hasrul, H. (2010).Politik Klientelisme Baru dalam Kepartaian di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial & Politik (JSP), 13(5).

Hein, L.(2010). Modernart patronage and democratic citizenship inJapan. The Journal of Asian Studies, 69(3), 821–841. doi:10.1017/S002191181000149X

Heper, M., &Keyman, E. F.(1998). Double-faced state: Political patronage and the consolidation of democracy in Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies,34(4), 259.

Hicken, A.(2008). How do rules and institutions encourage vote buying? in Electionsfor sale:The causesandconsequencesof vote buying, edited bySchaffer,F.C.,47–60. Colorado: Lynne Reinner.

Hrebenar,R. J. (2007). Clientelisticdemocracy. The Review of Politic, 69(1),163. Arts & Humanities Database.

Kopecký, P.,&Scherlis, G. (2008). Party patronage in contemporary Europe. European Review, 16(3), 355–371. doi:10.1017/S1062798708000306

Latief,H. (2013). The politics of benevolence: Political patronage of party-based charitable organizations in contemporary Indonesian Islam. Al-Jâmi‘ah, 51(2).doi: 10.14421/ajis.2013.512.337-363

LongleyAlley,A.(2010).The rules of the game: Unpacking patronage politics in Yemen. Middle East Journal M,64(3). doi: 10.3751/64.3.13

Miles, M.B.A., Huberman, M.,& JohnnySaldana, J.(2014). Qualitative dataanalysis: A methods sourcebook EdisiKetiga.Sage Publications Inc.

Muller, P.A., & Vousden, K. H. (2014). Mutant p53 in cancer: new functions and therapeutic opportunities. Cancer cell, 25(3), 304-317.

Nurfaizin. 2014. Runtuhnya Hubungan Patronase Kiai-Santri dalam Ruang Politik Lokal (Studi Pada Pemilukada Kabupaten Pamekasan Tahun 2013). Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial danI lmu Politik Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Panelewen, J. D. O. (2014). Penerapan Politik Patronase dalam Kemenangan Partai Keadilan dan Persatuan Indonesia Pada Pemilu Legislatif Kota BitungTahun 2009 . Yogyakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Gadjah Mada

Robinson, J. A., &Verdier,T. (2013). The political economy of clientelism. Scand. J. of Economics,115(2), 260–291.doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2013.12010.x

Sadanandan, A.(2012). Patronage and decentralization the politics of poverty in India. Comparative Politics, 44(2) 211–228. doi:10.1017/S0020743812000438

Scherlis,G. (2013). The contours of party patronage in Argentina. Latin American Research Review, 48(3), 64–263.

Scott, J. (1992). Patron–client politics and political change in Southeast Asia. The American Political Science Review, 66(1),91–113.

Waddell,B. J.(2015).Old habits die hard. Political patronage and remittance-led development in Guanajuato, Mexico. Latin American Research Review, 50(1),

Wigh,S.(2015). Social Scientist,43(5/6), 47–64. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24642346

Winters, J. A. (2016). Electoral dynamics in Indonesia: Money politics, patronage and clientelism at the grassroots, Bulletin of Indonesian EconomicStudies, 52(3),405–409.doi:10.1080/00074918.2016.1236653

WEBSITE

Detiknews.com 09 Apr 2014.CurhatSoekarwo, Suara Demokrat di Jatim Berat Menangi Pileg 2014. accessed in 15 October 2015

Jaringannews.com.BawansluJatimtemukanJualBeliSuara.accessed in 28 November 2015

Kompas.c om ht tp :// nasional.kom p as.c om /read/ 2014/04/16/1508474/Politik.Uang.Dimulai.dari.Elite accessed in 24 December 2015

Kom pa s.com.ht t p://nasional.komp as.com /read /2014/04/13/1801547/Politik.Uang.di.Pemilu.2014.Dinilai.Vulgar.,accessedin 24 May 2015

KPU.go.id accessed in 12 Agustus 2015

KPU.go.id.DemokratMemenangkanPileg di PacitandenganPerolehan 14 Kursiatau 35%. Accessed 15 October 2015

KPU.ponorogo.go.id accessed 20 September 2015

RRI.co.id. Partai Demokrat Peroleh Suara Terbanyak DPRD Kota Madiun.Accessed in 15 October 2015

INTERVIEW DATA

J.Harsono as lecturer in University MuhamadiyahPonorogo (2015)

NGO ‘Peduli Rakyat Cilik’ (2015)

Anetworkof successfulteams(2015)

Art figures of reog (2015)

Voters (2015)

Election candidates (2015

Downloads

Published

2023-04-04