Facial Morphometrics, Voters’ Facial Preferences, and Electoral Outcomes

Authors

  • JAMAIRAH A NAGAMORA Mindanao State University- Iligan Institute of Technology
  • ELIKA ER C BIENES Mindanao State University- Iligan Institute of Technology
  • MARILOU F. SITON NANAMAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2016.0048.697-721

Keywords:

Geometric Morphometric, Elections, Voter’s Facial Preferences

Abstract

Elections operate in such manner that voters must have researched well the political backgrounds and platforms of the candidates they are voting. However, in absence of other information, voters tend to resort to cues such as their perception on facial appearances. This study is a pioneering study to adopt facial morphometric in testing the influence of candidates‘facial appearance on their electoral outcomes while omitting other variables such as incumbency, partisanship, and popularity. It also investigates the facial preferences of voters with low political knowledge. This study is divided two-fold. The first phase is a facial morphometric analysis of 33 senatorial candidates from the 2013 Philippine national elections. Adopting the geometric morphometric method from natural
sciences, the facial characteristics of the generated consensus image of the senatorial candidates were analyzed and identified. The second phase was conducted to verify the findings of the first phase of the study through survey questionnaires with sets of morphed faces of presumptive candidates. The researchers morphed faces from masculinity-femininity continuum and asked the facial preferences of chosen respondents. The result of the first phase was found to corroborate with the second phase. It showed that the consensus image of the 33 senatorial candidates is characterized by a hyper masculine and hyper feminine facial morphometry.

References

Aharon, I., Etcoff, N., Ariely, D., Chabris, C. F., O’Connor, E., & Breiter, H. S. (2001).

Beautiful FacesHaveVariable Reward Value:fMRI and Behavioral Evidence.Neuron,

, 537-551.

Ambady, (1992), Bodily Communication 92nd Edn), London; Methuen

Armstrong, J.,Green,K.C., Jones Jr.,R. J.,&Wright,M.(2008). PredictingElections from

Politician’s Faces. Scholarly Commons,1-15.

Atkinson, M., Enos, R. D., & Hill, S. J. (2007). Candidate Faces and Election Outcomes.

Los Angeles: Unpublished manuscript.

Avery, Robert B. Patricia E. Beeson and Pail D. Calem. (1996). Using HMDA Data as a

Regulatory Screen for Fair Lending Compliance. HYPERLINK “http://www.springer.com/

new+%26+forthcoming+titles+(default)/journal/10693” Journal of Financial Ser-

vices Research

Bailenson, J.N.,Iyengar,S.,Yee,N.,&Collins,N.(2008).FacialSimilarityBetweenVoters

and Candidates Causes Influence. HYPERLINK “http://guilfordjournals.com/doi/abs/

1521/jscp.1997.16.1.43” Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(5), 935-961.

Ballew II, C. C., & Todorov, A. (2007). HYPERLINK “http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/

archive/S19/28/30C37/index.xml?section=topstories” Predicting political elections

from rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of

Sciences, 104(46), 17948-17953.

Banducci, S. A., Thrasher, M., Rallings, C., & Karp, J. (2003). HYPERLINK “http://

www.jkarp.com/pdf/apsa_2003.pdf” Candidate Appearance Cues in Low-Informa-

tion Elections. American Political Science Association.

Bashour, Mournir,(2005) Eyelid Recontructiion,Lower Eyelid. eMedicine

Berggren, N., Jordahl, H., & Poutvaara, P. (2006). HYPERLINK “http://ftp.iza.org/

dp2311.pdf” The Looks of a Winner: Beauty, Gender and Electoral Success. Helsinki

Center of Economic Research (119).

El Moliuno Milis, Edward Allen Vandercook (1976)..Began Operation. California

Face Research.(2016, March 11). Introduction to Attractiveness Research. Retrieved from

Face Research: HYPERLINK “http://faceresearch.org/students/attractiveness” http://

faceresearch.org/students/attractiveness

Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994). Human (Homo sapiens) Facial Attractiveness and

Sexual Selection: The Role of Symmetry and Averageness. HYPERLINK “http://

www.academia.edu/1969204/Human_Homo_sapiens_facial_attractiveness_and_-

sexual_selection_the_role_of_symmetry_and_averageness” Journal of Comparative

Psychology, 108(3), 233-242.

Hamermesh, D. S., & Biddle, J. E. (1994). HYPERLINK “https://wiwi.uni-paderborn.de/

fileadmin/dep1ls6/Research/Beauty_and_the_Labor_Market_Hamermesh_Biddle.pdf”

Beauty and the labor market. American Economic Review, 84(5), 1174-1194.

Hassin, R., & Trope, Y.(2000). Facing Faces: Studies on the Cognitive Aspect of Physiog-

nomy. HYPERLINK “http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10821193” Journal of Per-

sonality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 837-852.

International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. (2006). HYPERLINK “http://www.world-

cat.org/title/international-encyclopedia-of-the-social-sciences/oclc/183713985” Bio-

logical Determinism. Thomson Gale.

Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2007). HYPERLINK “http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/

BF03192944” The Role of Symmetry in Attraction to Average Faces. Perception and

Psychophysics, 69(8), 1273-1277.

Langlois, Judith H.; Kalakanis, Lisa; Rubenstein, Adam J.; Larson, Andrea; Hallam, Monica;

Smoot, Monica;.(2000). Maxims or Myths of Beauty? A Meta-Analytic and Theoreti-

cal Review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390-423.

Laustsen, L. (2014). HYPERLINK “http://politica.dk/fileadmin/politica/Dokumenter/ph.d.-

afhandlinger/lasse_laustsen.pdf” Choosing the Right Candidate: How the Evolved

Mind Votes in Modern Elections. Politica.

Lawson, C., Lenz, G., Baker, A., & Myers, M. (2010). HYPERLINK “http://web.mit.edu/

polisci/people/faculty/documents/Lawson%20lenz%20baker%20myers%202010.pdf”

Looking Like aWinner: CandidateAppearance and Electoral Success inNew Democ-

racies. World Politics, 62(4), 561-593.

Leorie Huddy, Nayda Terkildsen Am.J.Pol.Sc, (1993), HYPERLINK “https://www.jstor.org/

stable/2111526?seq=1” l “page_scan_tab_contents” Gender stereotypes and the

perception of male and female candidates. pp 119-147

Little,A.C.,Burriss,R.P.,Jones,B.C.,&Roberts,S.(2007).HYPERLINK“http://www.eh-

bonline.org/article/S1090-5138(06)00076-6/abstract” Facial appearance affects vot-

ing decisions. Evolution and Human Behavio r, 28, 18-27.

Lopez, A. (2012, February 27). Politics, In Your Face. Retrieved from The Evolution Insti-

tute: HYPERLINK “https://evolution-institute.org/article/politics-in-your-face” https://

evolution-institute.org/article/politics-in-your-face/

Mattes,K.,Spezio,M.,Kim,H.,Todorov,A.,Adolphs,R.,&Alvarez,R.(2010).HYPERLINK

http://people.hss.caltech.edu/~rma/Election%20Outcomes%20and -

%20Trait%20Assessments_02.pdf” Predicting Election Outcomes from Positive and

Negative TraitAssessment ofCandidate Images. Political Psychology, 31(1), 41-58.

Mutz,D.C.,Brody,R.A.,&Sniderman,P.M.(1996).HYPERLINK“https://www.jstor.org/

stable/3792091?seq=1” l “page_scan_tab_contents” Political Persuasion and Atti-

tude Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Nixon, B., & Pollom, S.(2006). HYPERLINK “http://psych.hanover.edu/research/Thesis06/NixonandPollom.pdf” Effects of Facial Maturity on Voting Preference. Unpublished

Manuscript.

Olivola, C. Y.,& Todorov, A.(2010). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-Based Trait

Inferences and Voting. HYPERLINK “http://www.fundraisingresearch.info/

USERIMAGES/olivolatodorov.pdf” J Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 83-110.

Perret, D. I., May, K. A., & Yoshikawa, S. (1994). HYPERLINK “http://www.nature.com/

nature/journal/v368/n6468/abs/368239a0.html” Facial shape and judgements of fe-

male attractiveness. Nature, 368, 239-242.

Poutvaara, P., Jordahl, H., & Berggren, N. (2009). Face of Politicians: Babyfacedness pre-

dicts inferred competence but not electoral success. HYPERLINK “https://

www.researchgate.net/publication/222825748_Faces_of_Politicians_Baby-

facedness_Predicts_Inferred_Competence_but_Not_Electoral_Success” Journal of

Experimental Social Psychology, 45(5), 1132-1135.

Quezon III, M. L. (2015, October 5). The Great Referendum: The National Election of

Retrieved from Inquirer: HYPERLINK “http://opinion.inquirer.net/89706/the-

great-referendum-the-national-election-of-2016” http://opinion.inquirer.net/89706/

the-great-referendum-the-national-election-of-2016

Rosen, D. (2013, October 21). Face Off: How First Impressions Decide Elections. Re-

trieved from Campaign and Elections: HYPERLINK “http://www.campaign-

andelections.com/magazine/1732/face-off-first-impressions-decide-elections” http:/

/www.campaignandelections.com/magazine/1732/face-off-first-impressions-decide-

elections.

Smith R, Red Smit. (2000). HYPERLINK “http://www.publishersweekly.com/978-1-56663-

-8” OnBaseballTheGame’sGreatestWriter OnTheGame’sGreatest Years.Ivan

R DeePublishers

Spezio, M., Loesch, L., Gosselin, F.,Mattes, K., & Alvarez, R.(2012).HYPERLINK “http://

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00897.x/abstract” Thin-Slice

Decisions Do Not Need Faces to be Predictive of Election Outcomes. Political Psychol-

ogy, 33(3), 331-341.

Todorov, A., Olivola, C. Y., Dotsch, R., & Mende-Siedlecki, P.(2015). Social Attributions

from Faces: Determinants, Consequences, Accuracy, and Functional Significance.

Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 15.1-15.27.

Thornhill, (2000), The Clinical Examination.Baltimore. Fourth Edition

White, A., Kenrick, D. T.,& Neuberg, S. L. (2013). HYPERLINK “http://www.annualreviews.-

org/eprint/EIiV7qBNKRKA2uTieC5T/full/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831”

BeautyattheBallotBox:DiseaseThreatsPredictPreferencesforPhysicallyAttractive

Leaders. Psyhcological Science, 1-8.

Zebrowitz, L. A., & Montepare, J. M. (2005). HYPERLINK “http://science.sciencemag.org/

content/308/5728/1565” PSYCHOLOGY: Appearance DOES Matter. Science,

(5728), 1565-1566.

Zebrowitz, L. A., Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A., & Rhodes, G. (2002). HYPERLINK “http://

psp.sagepub.com/content/28/2/238.abstract”LookingSmartandLookingGood:Facial

Cues to Intelligence and Their Origins. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,

(2), 238-249.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-04