The Social Media as a Transformative Agent in the Electoral Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2016.0033Keywords:
social media, political campaign, communication, preference, political participation, transformationAbstract
The growing use of social media in social interaction has changed the mode of
political campaign in the Philippines. This research sought to determine the influences of social media in the presidential prefer-ences of netizens during the campaign period for the 2016 presidential elections in the Philippines. It also looked into the pattern of the preferences of respon-dents among the five presidential candidates for the 2016 presidential election. A total of 289 respondents participated out of 1210 visitors of the link used by the researchers. The data gathering started on February 9, 2016, the start of the presidential campaign period and ended on March 27, 2016 or a total of 47 days. The timeline for data gathering was constrained by the time limit that was set for this study. The results show that social media has no strong influence in the preferences of respondents with only 44% of the respondents saying that their presidential preferences were influenced by social media. However, 75.6% . The pattern of the preferences of respondents shows strong resemblance to some mock polls conducted by other groups in the Philippines during the cam-paign period. It is recommended to continue exploring the relevance of social media as a political tool for effective communication in politics and governance.
References
Lefebvre, RC (2000). In PN Bloom & GT Gundlach (Eds.), Handbook of Marketing and
Society, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Michaelsen, Marcus (2011). New Media vs. Old Politics: The Internet, Social Media, and
Democratization in Pakistan. 10874 Berlin, Germany: Fesmdia Asia Rovai, Alfred I, Jason D. Baker, and Michael K. Ponton (2013). Social Science Research
Design and Statistics (1 ed.) Watertree Press. Journal
Boyd, D. M, Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholar- ship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), article 11. Castells, Manuel (2010). The Rise of the Network Society Wiley-Blackwell. The informa- tion Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Kushin, Matthew James and Masahiro Yamamoto (2010). “Did Social Media Really Mat- ter? College Students’ Use of Online Media and Political Decision Making in the 2008
Election”. Mass Communication and Society Academic Search Premier. EBSCO.Web. 13 April 2011. Stumpel, Mark (2011). The Political Power of Social Media; Facebook: Control and Resis- tance. Politics from a new Perspective: Council of Foreign Relations Levinson, Paul (2000). McLuhan and Media Ecology. Proceedings of the Media Ecology
Association, Volume 1, 2000. Dissertation
Parikh, Komal H. (2012). Political Fandom in the Age of Social Media. University of Lon- don. Sztrojiny, Robert (2011). Social Media Marketing: The Relation of Customer Engagement and Worl-of-Mouth on fcebook. Robert Sztrojiny 2011 Social Media Marketing. Avans Hogeschool, International Business School. The Netherlands. Thesis Arch, Benjamin (2013). The Current Development and Trends of social Media Marketing
Strategies for Businesses. TurkuUniversity of Applied Science. Finland. Armin, Wolf (2010). Young Audiences, Mass Media, and Political Information. Berlin
School of Creative Leadership. Germany. Auvinen, Ari-Matti. Social Media – The New Political Power of Political Influence. Centre
for European Studies. Europe. Birgisdóttir, Lilja Kristín (2014). The Rising Influence of Social Media in Politics: How Barack
Obama Used Social Media as a Successful Campaign Tool in the 2008 and 2012
Elections. Cogburn, Derrick L & Fatima K, Espinoza-Vasquez. 2011. “From Networked Nominee to Networked Nation: Examining the Impact of Web 2.0 and Social Media on Political
Participation and Civic Engagement in the 2008 Obama Campaign.” Syracuse Uni- versity. New York. Frey, Benedikt and Stefan Rudloff (2010) Social media and the impact on marketing
communication. Luleå University of Technology. Mabry, Emily Fay (2010). Engaging Audiences: An Analysis of Social Media Usage in Advertising. Louisiana State University and Agriculture and Mechanical College. Pugh, Jessica Lee (2010). A Qualitative Study of the Facebook Social Network: The Desire
to Influence, Associate, and Construct a Representative and Ideal Identity. California State University. Rahmawati, Indriani (2014). Social Media, Politics, and Young Adults. University of Twete. The Netherlands. Smith, Kristian Nicole (2011). Social Media and Political Campaigns. University of Tennes- see. Knoxville. Veer, Jokir Ter (2013). The Effect of Social Media During Elections: Impact of participation
in social networking sites by voters on their decisions during the Dutch parliamentary electionsin 2012. Universiteit Leiden. The Netherlands. Emenyeonu, Bernard Nnamdi (“n.d”). Media Uses and Gratifications: A Review. Univer- sity of Nigeria Online DeMers, Jayson (2014). The Top Ten Benefits of Social Media Marketing. Frobes. http:// www. forbes.com/sites/jaysondemers/2014/08/11/the-top-10-benefits-of-social-me- dia-marketing/2/
Gamboa, Elisa (2015). Use Social Media Responsibly! http://www.artsandnotes.com/
index.php/eliseanotes/523-use-social-media-responsibly. Kusinitz, Sam (2014). 16 Stats That Proves Social Media Isn’t Just a Fad. http://
blog.hubspot.com/marketing/social-media-roi-stats
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.
