The Indonesian Police Reform: Police in the Reform Era based on New Institutionalism Perspective

Authors

  • ACHMAD NURMANDI Department of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • ISNAINI MUALLIDIN Department of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • EKO PRIYO PURNOMO Department of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • SURYANTO SURYANTO Department of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2016.0029

Keywords:

new intitutionalism, Anti Corruption Agency, police, corruption, conflict

Abstract

Since the reformation and democratization movement in 1998, Indonesians have faced a chronic corruption problem. At the beginning of reformation era in
1998 to fight against corruption, the Indonesian government reforms the organization structure of the Indonesia Police to be an independent body separated from the Military organization. The police reforms begun in 1999 and got legal foundation with Act No. 2/2002. However, since fourteen years, the level of police reform has not yet succeed because of low community satisfaction on police service and the intense conflicts always occur whenever ACA investigates the case of corruptions conducted by police leaders. Three conflicts between police institution and ACA have taken placed. By using institutionalism approach, this research focus on the reform in police themselves are major actors on how reforms are organized and managed. This study is interpretative in nature gained only through social constructions such as language, consciousness, shared meanings, documents, tools, and other artefacts’. This finding revealed that this unsuccessful institutionalization process took place in a context of the main task of police for communicty service. Second, the study has demonstrated that three concepts from institutional theory as aforementioned provided vocabularies and insights to explain the phenomenon under study.

References

Bayley, D. H. (2001). Democratizing the police abroad: whatto do and how to do it(p.

.US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice

Butt, S. (2011). Anti-corruption reform in Indonesia: an obituary?. Bulletin of Indonesian

Economic Studies, 47(3), 381-394.

Buttle,J.W.,Davies,S.G.,&Meliala,A.E.(2015).Aculturalconstraintstheoryofpolice

corruption: Understanding the persistence of police corruption in contemporary In-

donesia. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology.

Chavance, Bernard. (2008). “Formal and informal institutional change: the experience of

postsocialist transformation”. The European Journal of Comparative Economics Vol.

, n. 1.

Clark, S. (2012). Courting Corruption in Post-Suharto Indonesia: A Model of Local Cor-

ruption Prosecutions in a New Democracy.

Davies, S. G., Meliala, A., & Buttle, J. (2014). Gangnam Style versus Eye of the Tiger:

people, police and procedural justice in Indonesia. Policing and Society, (ahead-of-

print), 1-22.

Fennell,S.2010.Rules,rubricsandriches:theinterrelationsbetweenlegalreformand

international development, Abingdon England ; New York, Routledge

Ferawati, Meily. (2013). “Harmonisasi Pola Hubungan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dan

Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Dalam Memberantas Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indone-

sia”. Skripsi

Goldsmith,A.(2005).Policereformand theproblemoftrust.Theoretical criminology,

(4), 443-470.

Helmke,Gretchen and Levitsky, Steven. 2004. “Informal Institutions andComparative

Politics: A Research Agenda”. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 2, No. 4 Dec.

Heywood, A. 2011. Global politics, Houndmills, Basingstoke Hampshire ; New York,

Palgrave Macmillan

Holloway,Richard.(2002). Stealing fromthePeople16StudiesofCorruption inIndone-

sia Book 2: The Big Feast– Soldier, Judge, Banker,Civil Servant,the Aksara Founda-

tion on behalf ofthe Partnership forGovernance Reform in Indonesia, Jakarta.

Hodgson, G. M. 2006. What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, 40, 1-25.

Jacobs, L.G., & Wagner,B. B.(2007). Limits to the Independent Anti-Corruption Com-

missionModelofCorruptionReform:LessonsfromIndonesia.Pac.McGeorgeGlobal

Bus. & Dev. LJ, 20, 327

Kumssa, A. (2015). Police Corruption: A Perspective on its Nature and Control.

Kunarto (1995), Critics to Police (Merenungi Kritik Terhadap POLRI), Jakarta: Cipta

Manunggal, 1995

Levi, M. (1998) ‘A State of Trust’, in V. Braithwaite and M. Levi (eds) Trust and Gover-

nance, pp. 77–101. New York: Russell Sage

Lim,Merlyna,(2013),”ManyClicksbutLittleSticks: SocialMediaActivisminIndonesia”,

, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 2013Vol. 43, No. 4, 636–657)

McCARTHY,J.F.(2000).Thechanging regime:forestpropertyandreformasiinIndonesia.

Development and Change, 31,91–129

Meliala, A. (2001). Police as military: Indonesia’s experience. Policing: An International

Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 24(3), 420-432.

North,D.C. 1990.Institutions,institutional change, andeconomic performance,Cam-

bridge ; New York, Cambridge UniversityPress.

North, D. C. 1991. Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 97-112.

Nugroho, Hibnu. 2013. “Efektivitas Fungsi Koordinasi dan Supervisi Dalam Penyidikan

Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi”. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum

Vol. 13 No. 3 September.

Lim,Merlyna,(2013),”ManyClicksbutLittleSticks: SocialMediaActivisminIndonesia”,

, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 2013Vol. 43, No. 4, 636–657)

Pejovich,S.1999. “TheEffectsoftheInteractionof Formal andInformalInstitutionson

SocialStabilityandEconomicDevelopment”. JournalofMarkets&Morality,2(2).

Rachnaningsih, Rani. 2013. “Benturan Kewenangan Polri Dan Kpk Sebagai Penyidik Dalam

Kasus Simulator Sim (Kajian Yuridis Penyelesaian Melalui Memorandum Of Under-

standing)”. Jurnal Ilmiah Untuk Memenuhi Sebagian Syarat-Syarat Untuk

Memperoleh Gelar Kesarjanaan Dalam Ilmu Hukum Universitas Brawijaya Malang.

Partohap, T. H., & Pradiptyo, R. (2015). Who Cares of Anti Corruption Agency? An As-

sessment of Court Decisions for Corruption Cases in Indonesia Using Proportional

Hazard Model1. AnAssessment of CourtDecisions for Corruption Cases in Indonesia

Using Proportional Hazard Model (April 15, 2015)

Paun,C.(2007).Democratization andpolice reform(Doctoraldissertation, FUBerlin).

Pejovich, S.,(1999). “The Effects ofthe Interactionof Formal and Informal Institutions

onSocial Stability and Economic Development”, Journal of Markets and Morality ,

Vol. 2, No. 2

Scott, Richard W. (2009). Institution and Organization, Sage, Los Angeles, 2009.

Selznick, P. (1996). Institutionalism “old” and “new.” Administrative Science Quarterly,

, 270-277.

Smith,J.,Obidzinski,K.,Subarudi, S.,&Suramenggala,I.(2003).Illegallogging, collu-

sive corruption and fragmented governments in Kalimantan, Indonesia. International

Forestry Review, 5(3), 293-302.

Sukma, R., & Prasetyono, E. (2003). Security sector reform in Indonesia: The military and

the police. La Haye, Netherland Institute of International Relations “Clindengael”,

février,disponible sur< http://www. clingendael. nl/cru/pdf/working_paper_9. PDF

Tatuil, Gidion. S. H. 2013. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Atas Kewenangan Penyidikan Kpk

DanPolisiDalam MenanganiKasusKorupsi”. Lex et Societatis,Vol.I/No.3/Juli.

Theodore E. Zorn (et. al (2010).”Institutional and NoninstitutionalInfluences on Informa-

tion andCommunication Technology Adoptionand Use Among Nonprofit Organiza-

tions”, Human Communication Research 37(2011)1–33.

Tat-KeiHoand Tobin Im (2013). “Challenges in Building Effective andCompetitiveGov-

ernment in Developing Countries: An Institutional Logics Perspective”, American Re-

view of Public Administration XX(X) 1 –18.

Thomassen,G.(2013).Corruptionandtrustinthepolice:Across-country study

Umar,Bambang Widodo (2009).Indonesia Police Reform, Jakarta:IDSPS Press

Downloads

Published

2023-04-04

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)