An Exploratory Study of the Effectiveness of Unconditional EducationalAssistance Program as a Programmatic Electoral Strategy in the Philippines: The Case of Makati City’s Project FREE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.v13i3.15997Keywords:
Educational Assistance, Philippines, Programmatic Politics, MakatiAbstract
This exploratory study deviated from the influential theoretical lens of clientelism in examining voter-politician ties in Philippine political studies. Drawing on Kitschelt and Wilkinson’s (2007) conceptualization of programmatic politics as an alternative electoral strategy, we investigated how a programmatic linkage between a local political leader and its electoral constituency is facilitated through the non-contingent and regular distribution of school-related materials for public school children. This local programmatic policy has gained popularity among various local government units (LGUs) in the Philippines. We focused on the Makati City government’s Project FREE (Free Relevant and Excellent Education) due to its reputation for arguably being the most innovative and comprehensive educational assistance program ever implemented at the country’s local scale. We employed a purposive sampling technique to obtain our participants – the project’s parent beneficiaries. Through in-depth interviews, we investigated the attitudes and perceptions of Project FREE’s parent beneficiaries towards the mayor’s programmatic commitment to them. By using thematic analysis, five themes emerged from the interview data: (1) financial relief, (2) educational security, (3) unique source of local citizen satisfaction, (4) personally dispensed patronage of a benefactor politician, and (5) invaluable benefits and project continuity: influencing vote preference. Beyond the particularistic and contingency-based patronage exchange prevalent in the Philippine local political setting, this study’s findings also offer in-depth explanations for what motivates voters to reciprocate their local political leader with electoral support for its education-based programmatic inducements.
References
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic Analysis. In H. Cooper, P. Camic, D. Long, A. T. Patner, D. Rindskopf, & K. Sher (Eds.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology Vol. 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
Bulut, A. (2020). How Clientelistic Parties Go Programmatic: The Strategic Logic of Responsiveness in a Least Likely Case (the AKP of Turkey). Comparative Politics, 52(2), 333–356.
Calvo, E., & Murillo, M. V. (2012). When Parties Meet Voters: Assessing Political Linkages Through Partisan Networks and Distributive Expectations in Argentina and Chile. Comparative Political Studies, 46(7), 851–882. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012463882
Clapham, C. (1982). Clientelism and The State. In C. Clapham (Ed.), Private Patronage and Public Power: Political Clientelism in the Modern State (pp. 1–35). Frances Printer.
David, C., & Albert, J. R. (2012). Primary Education: Barriers to Entry and Bottlenecks to Completion.
Gebru, S. G. (2014). Political Parties, Party Programmaticity, and Party System in Post 1991 Ethiopia. European Scientific Journal, 10(16), 417–440.
Harjanto, I. (2019). Identity and Programmatic Politics in a Javanese Village Chief Election: The Case of Temon Kulon, Yogyakarta. Irwan Harjanto, 7(2), 225–253. https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.52510
Hicken, A. (2011). Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220508
Hicken, A., Aspinall, E., & Weiss, M. (Eds.). (2019). Electoral Dynamics in the Philippines: Money Politics, Patronage, and Clientelism at the Grassroots. NUS Press.
Hicken, A., Hutchcroft, P., Weiss, M., & Aspinall, E. (2019). Introduction: The Local Dynamics of the National Election in the Philippines. In A. Hicken, E. Aspinall, & M. Weiss (Eds.), Electoral Dynamics in the Philippines: Money Politics, Patronage, and Clientelism at the Grassroots (pp. 1–42). NUS Press.
Hutchcroft, P., & Rocamora, J. (2003). Strong Demands and Weak Institutions: The Origins and Evolution of the Democratic Deficit in the Philippines. Journal of East Asian Studies, 3(2), 259–292. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/S1598240800001363
Kasuya, Y. (2009). Presidential Bandwagon: Parties and Party Systems in the Philippines. Anvil Publishing Inc.
Kimura, M. (2018). Clientelism Revisited. In M. Thompson & E. V. Batalla (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of the Contemporary Philippines (pp. 17–25). Routledge.
Kitschelt, H. (2000). Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities. Comparative Political Studies, 33(6/7), 845–879. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041400003300607
Kitschelt, H. (2012). Research and Dialogue on Programmatic Parties and Party Systems.
Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. (2007). Citizen-Politican Linkages: An Introduction. In H. Kitschelt & S. Wilkinson (Eds.), Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Cooperation (pp. 1–49). Cambridge University Press.
Lucas, K. (2015). Programmatic Political Competition in Latin America: Recognizing the Role Played by Political Parties in Determining the Nature of Party-Voter Linkages. University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy.
Mas’Udi, W., & Kurniawan, N. I. (2017). Programmatic Politics and Voter Preferences: The 2017 Election in Kulon Progo, Yogyakarta. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 39(9), 449–469. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1355/cs39-3c
Mendoza, R., & Altavas, M. (2015, July 9). Makati, inequality and free cake. Rappler.
Molleda, J. V., Sample, K., & van der Staak, S. (2014). Implications for Action: Enablers, Triggers, Lockers and Agents of Programmatic Parties. In N. Cheeseman, J. P. Luna, H. Kitschelt, D. Paget, F. Rosenblat, K. Sample, S. Toro, J. V. Molleda, S. van der Staak, & Y. Wang (Eds.), Politics Meets Policies: The Emergence of Programmatic Politics (pp. 99–116). International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
New NEDA study identifies reasons behind Filipino women’s low labor participation rate. (2019). National Economic Development Authority.
Philippine Statistics Authority. (2018). Multidimensional Poverty Index. https://psa.gov.ph/content/filipino-families-are-most-deprived-education-0
Querubin, P. (2016). Family and Politics: Dynastic Persistence in the Philippines. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 11, 151–181. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014182
Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & Elam, G. (2003). Designing and Selecting Samples. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice (pp. 77–108). Sage Publications Ltd.
Roniger, L. (2004). Political Clientelism, Democracy, and Market Economy. Comparative Politics, 36(3), 353–375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/4150135
Santos, J. (2020, February 23). Makati allots P3.3 billion for education in 2020. Manila Bulletin.
Schaffer, F. (2007). Why Study Vote Buying? In F. Schaffer (Ed.), Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying (pp. 1–16). Ateneo De Manila University Press.
Scott, J. (1972). Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. The American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/1959280
Stokes, S. (2011). Political Clientelism. In R. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Science (pp. 648–672). Oxford University Press.
Teehankee, J. C. (2012). Clientelism and Party Politics in the Philippines. In D. Tomsa & A. Ufen (Eds.), Party Politics in Southeast Asia: Clientelism and Electoral Competition in Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines (pp. 186–214). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137277206
Weiss, M. (2019). Patronage Politics and Parties in the Philippines: Insights from the 2016 Elections. In P. Hutchcroft (Ed.), Strong Patronage, Weak Parties: The Case for Electoral System Redesign in the Philippines (pp. 133–148). Anvil Publishing Inc.
Willig, C. (2008). Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology (2nd ed.). Open University Press.
Zurbano, J. (2019a, January 16). Makati expands Project FREE. Manila Standard.
Zurbano, J. (2019b, April 5). Education top priority, says Makati’s Binay. Manila Standard.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.
