Strongmen of Political Party at Local Level: A Case Study on Fight between Blater and Lora Elites in Partai Amanat Nasional in Malang, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.8152Keywords:
Political Party, Local Strongmen, Democratic Party, Authority EliteAbstract
The study aims to describe the political party’s local elite in Malang, East Java, Indonesia. Previous researchers found out that there were variation, relation and interaction among political elites at the local level. In Malang, a district of East Java Province, there are some local power of politics in practice namely Blater elite and Lora elite. Blater is a group of local strongmen who has strong collabo- ration with the elite oligarchy at the level local. Both of them have done unfair practice of nepotism in the field of politics to achieve power of Partai Amanat Nasional (PAN) at the local level. On the other hand, Lora elite is a group of local strongmen, working together in synergy with the democratic elite to have access to power of the political party. In short, both of the political elites have been competitive to get the power of PAN. The following are the findings of the research:
1) The existence of political party strongmen shows that the capacity of indi- vidual of the elites has the authority to determine various power context of the political party; 2) In the context of power, the existence of political party strongmen can limit and reduce the implementation of the political party regulation in the internal dynamics of the local inner circle of political party; and 3) Close relations depends upon a symbiotic relationship and the expression of mutual interest between the strongmen blater and the oligarchy so that patron-client relation could take place.
References
Bourguignon,F.,&Verdier,T.(2000).Oligarchy,democracy,inequality andgrowth. Journal
of development Economics, 62(2), 285-313.
Bratton, M. (1994). Civil society and political transition in Africa (pp. 51-82). Boston, Mass.: Institute for Development Research.
Etzioni-Halevy, E. (1990). Democratic-elite theory: Stabilization versus breakdown of
democracy. European Journal of Sociology, 31(02), 317-350.
Eyoh, D. (1998). Through the prism of a local tragedy: political liberalisation, regionalism
and elite struggles for power in Cameroon. Africa, 68(03), 338-359.
Graham, T. (1999). From oligarchy to oligarchy: the structure of Russia’s ruling
elite. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization,7(3), 325-340.
Haryanto, Ariel (1990), State Ideology and Civil Discourse’, in State and Civil Society in
Indonesia, ed. Arif Budiman, Centre for Southeast Asian Studies, Clayton,
Victoria: Monash University
Higley,J.,&Pakulski, J.(2012).ElitePowerGames andDemocraticConsolidation inCen-
tral and Eastern Europe [1999]. Historical SocialResearch/HistorischeSozialforschung,
-319.
Keller, S. (1995). PenguasadanKelompokElit.(terj.). Jakarta: RajaGrafindoPersada.
Keller, S. I. (1991). Beyond the ruling class: strategic elites in modern society. Transaction
Publishers.
Lasswell, H. D., Lerner,D., &Rothwell, C. E.(1952). The comparative study of elites: An
introductionandbibliography
MacAndrews, C., &Mas1⁄4ud, M. (1991). PerbandinganSistemPolitik. GadjahMada Uni-
versity Press.
Migdal, J. S. (1988). Strong societies and weak states: state-society relations and state
capabilities in the Third World. Princeton University Press.
Migdal, J. S. (2001). State in society: Studying how states and societies transform and
constitute one another. Cambridge University Press.
Migdal, J. S. (2001). State in society: Studying how states and societies transform and
constitute one another. Cambridge University Press.
Mitra,S.K.(1991).Roomtomaneuverinthemiddle:Localelites,politicalaction,andthe
state in India. World Politics, 43(03), 390-413.
Moleong, Lexy, (2002), MetodePenelitianKualitatif, Bandung: PT RemajaRosdakarya.
Mosca, G. (1939). 3. On the Ruling Class.
Muhammad,A.A.(2008).IntraPartyRelations andConflictinNigeria.PakistanJournalof
Social Sciences, 5(1), 42-50.
Okamoto, M., &Rozaki, A. (2006). Kelompokkekerasandanboslokal di era Reformasi.
Diterbitkankerjasama Centerfor SoutheastAsianStudies (CSES),Universitas Kyoto,
Jepang [dengan] IRE Press, Yogyakarta.
Pareto, V. (1991). The rise and fall of the elites: an application of theoretical sociology.
Transaction Publishers.
Putnam,R.D.(1976).The comparative study of politicalelites.
Putnam,R.D.(1976).Thecomparative studyofpoliticalelites.
Richard,R.,&Vedi,H.(2004).ReorganisingPowerinIndonesia:ThePoliticsofOligarchy
in an Age of Markets. London and New York: Routledge.
Rozaki. A.( 2004 ). Menaburkharismamenuaikuasa:
kiprahkiaidanblatersebagairezimkembar di Madura. PustakaMarwa.
Savirani, A. (2004). Local Strongmen in New Regional Politics in Indonesia.
Sidel, J. T. (1999). Capital, coercion, and crime: Bossism in the Philippines. Stanford Uni-
versity Press.
Sidel, J. T. (1999). Capital, coercion, and crime: Bossism in the Philippines. Stanford Uni-
versity Press.
Soehino, (2001),IlmuNegara,Yogyakarta: Liberty
Sørensen, E.(2002).Democratic theory and network governance.Administrative Theory
& Praxis, 24(4),693-720.
Steelman, T.A.(2001). Elite and participatory policymaking: Finding balance ina case of
national forest planning. Policy Studies Journal, 29(1),71-89.
Varma,S.P.(2001).TeoriPolitikModern,RajaGrafindoPersada, Jakarta., 1993.Thepoli-
tics of nature: Explorations in green political theory.Varma, S. P.(2001). TeoriPolitikModern,RajaGrafindoPersada, Jakarta., 1993. The poli-
tics of nature: Explorations in green political theory.
Winters, J. A. (2011). Oligarchy. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Wiyata, A. Latief. 2006. “Manusia Madura: Pandangan Hidup, Perilaku, dan Etos Kerja.
Pemetaan Kebudayaan Di Provinsi Jawa Timur: Sebuah Upaya Pencarian Nilai-nilai Positif.
Ayu Sutarto (Eds). Biro Mental Spiritual PemerintahProvinsi Jawa Timur Bekerja Sama
dengan Kompyawisda- Jember.
Zuckerman,A.(1977).TheConcept”PoliticalElite”: LessonsfromMoscaandPareto. The
Journal of Politics, 39(2), 324-344.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.