Resources Exchange Model in Implementation Network of Fishermen Community Policy in Makassar City

Authors

  • GITA SUSANTI Department of Public Administration, Universitas Hasanudin
  • ALWI ALWI Department of Public Administration, Universitas Hasanudin
  • LA TAMBA Department of Public Administration, Universitas Hasanudin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.8153

Keywords:

Resources Exchange, Implementation Policy Network, Fishermen Community, Empowerment Policy

Abstract

Public policy implementation network is a study that tried to accumulate all the stakeholders as potential resources to determine and implement a public policy. Fishermen community empowerment policy is the policy, which is complex be- cause it includes varied stakeholders. The main objective of this study is to develop a model of resources exchange in the implementation network of fisher- men community empowerment policy in Makassar City, which includes the avail- ability of resources and the rule of the game of resources exchange. This study uses qualitative design and case study strategy. Based on the pairing patterns technique, the availability of the resources needed by the fishermen group has not been sufficient to run his business. This is caused by a major source of fund- ing in this policy from the central government. Then, the fishermen community empowerment policy is still dominated by rule of the game of public bureau- cracy as the policy implementer in the resources exchange. Therefore, local gov- ernments need to develop the synergy with all stakeholders and establish a rule of the game based on the network-based organization.

Implementation Policy Network; Fishermen Community Empowerment Policy

References

Alwi&Kasmad, R. 2014.Bureaucratic System Vs. People Empowerment Policy: Empirical

Evidence From Cocoa Farmer Empowerment Policyin South Sulawesi Province, Indo-

nesia. Humanities and Sosial Sciences Review. Volume 03. Number 04. pp. 313 –

Aldrich, Howard 1974a “An inter-organizational dependency perspective on relations

between the employmentserviceanditsorganization-set.”Ithaca,N.Y.:CornellUni-

versity (mimeo).

Anwar P.2011.The Implementation of Community Empowerment National Program; A

case Study of Social Economic Infrastructure Development in Bone District (unpub-

lisheddissertation). Makassar. Hasanuddin UniversityPostgraduateProgram.

Becerra,RaquelL.1999.InterorganizationalServiceDeliverySystems:StudyingaDiffer-

ent Kind of Arrangement. DalamProceeding Twelfth Annual International conference

of Public Administration Theory Network. Florida.

Compston Huge (2009). Policy Network and Policy Change: putting policy network theory

to the test. The UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cook, S Karen (1977).Exchange and Power in Networks of Interorganizational Relations.

The sociological quarterly 18 (winter 1977): 62-82.

Dahan, Nicolas (2005), „A Contribution to the conceptualization of political resources

utilized in corporate political action‟, Journal of Public Affairs 5: 43-54.

Gulati, Ranjay; Gargiulo, Martin. 1998. Where Do Inter-organizational Networks Come

From?Melalui<http://www.ranjaygulati.com/new/research/interorg.pdf>

/30/2004] Hasniati, dkk. 2013. Models of Poverty Alleviation Policy; a Coastal

Community Based

Empowerment in Takalar District. Makassar: LP2M Unhas.

Jaffee, David. 2001. Organization Theory : Tension and Change. New York : McGraw-Hill

Companies, Inc.

Jones, Gareth R. 2004. Organizational Theory, Design, and Change: Textand Cases.USA

: Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

Jones, Charles O. (1984). An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy (3rdEdition). Cali-

fornia: Brooks/ ColePublishingCompany.

Levine,SolandPaulE.White 1969 “Exchangeasa conceptual frameworkforthestudyof

inter-organizationalrelationships.”Pp. 117-32 inAmitaiEtzioni (ed.), ASociological

ReaderonComplexOrganizationsSecondedition.New York:Holt, Rinehart& Win-

ston, Inc.

Menzel, C Donald (1987).An Inter-organizational Approach to Policy Implementation.Public

Administration Quarterly (1986-1989) pg 3.

Miles, Matthew danHuberman, A. Michael. 1992. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods

Sourcebook. Jakarta:UI Press.

O‟toole,Jr,LaurenceJ., (2005). InterorganizationalRelationsin Implementation.InBGay

Peters&JonPierre. 2005. InHandbook of Public Administration. London:SAGEPub-

lications Ltd.

Regulation of theFinance Ministers number 168 of 2015 on the Implementation Mecha-

nismofGovernmentBudgetAssistancetotheMinistriesandState Institutions.

Peters,BGuy (2003).HandbookofPublicAdministration.London: SAGEPublicationsLtd.

Rhodes, R.A.W(1985),„Power- Dependence, Policy Communities andintergovernmental

networks‟, Public Administration Bulletin 49: 4-31

Rhodes, R.A.W. (2000), „Governance and public administration‟, in jonpierre (ed.), De-

bating Governance,Oxford:OUP

Robert, Nancy. 2000. Wicked Problems and Network Approaches to Resolution. Dalam

InternationalPublic Management Review.Vol. 1, Issue 1.-Electronic Journal http://

www.ipmr.net (10/18/2003).

Satria, Arif. 2001. An Introduction to Sociology of Coastal Communities. Jakarta.

PustakaCidesindo.

Susanti, Gita 2012. Democratic Public Service Network (Cace Study Coordination System

of Determation of Network Based Education Services In The City Makassar) (unpub-

lished dissertation). Hasanuddin University Postgraduate Program.

Taufik, 2015.The Public Policy Network; A Case Study of the Implementation of Syari’at

Islam Policy in the District of Bireuen, Aceh Province. Makassar; PostgraduatePro-

gram of HasanuddinUniversity.

Thompson, James D. 1967Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Yin, Robert K. (2000).Case Study Research : Design and Methods. 3rd Ed, Translated by M.

DjauziMudzakir. Jakarta : Raja GrafindoPersada.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-04