Local Autonomy and Inter-Sector Performance-Based-Governance in Lampung Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2014.0016Keywords:
local autonomy, inter-sector performance, based governanceAbstract
The dramatic shift in the management of local government
in Indonesia, from the centralised, authoritarian
New Order Era to the more democratic Reformation
Era since 1996, met public demands for,
among other things, more accountability.
Decentralised local government requires a system
that allows the Central Government to supervise and,
at the same time, gives local governments the capacity
to carry out their duties. This paper compares
the institutional capacity of three regencies in
Lampung using a ten-part inter-sector performance
evaluation method developed by the Sustainable
Capacity Building for Decentralization , project
funded by the Indonesian Ministry of Home Affairs.
Three separate surveys between 2007-2011 used the
data from a 10% sample of all civil servants in
each rank. We show that local government institutional
capacities in Lampung Province differ not only
regionally, but also within inter-sectors functions. All
three regencies performed poorly in the inter-sector
function of information and communication, and
all three performed best in procurement of goods
and services. In terms of local autonomy, the single
recipe of symmetric decentralization which applies
similarly all over Indonesia, needs to be replaced,
we suggest, with asymmetric decentralization, which
is more suited to the local governments’ varied institutional
needs.
Keywords: local autonomy, inter-sector performance
based governance
References
Darmastuti, Ari. Tantangan dan Peluang Reformasi Birokrasi
dalam Rangka
Peningkatan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan di Provinsi Lampung
(Challenges and Opportunities of Bureaucratic
Reformation for the Advancement of Government
Management in Lampung Province) “, a paper
presented at the National Seminar on Bureaucratic
Reformation in Indonesia, conducted by General
Secretariat of the Regional Representative Council of
the Republic of Indonesia and the Faculty of Social
and Political Sciences, University of Lampung,
Indonesia. Bandarlampung, 14 November 2011
Balaguer-Coll, Maria Teresa, Diego Prior, Emili Tortosa-
Ausina. On the Determinants of LocalGovernment
Performance: A Two Stage Nonparametric Approach.
Working paper presented at Economic Measurement
Group Workshop 2002 in the School of Economics,
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Bovaird, Tony , and Elke Loffler. 2003, Public Manage-
ment and Governance. London:
Routledge.
Delaney, John T., Mark A. Huselid. The Impact of
Human Resource Management Practices on Percep-
tions of Organizational Performance. Academy of
Management Journal. 1996. Vol. 39. Number 4. Pp.
Drake, Elizabeth, Ambreen Malik, Ying Xu, Joanna
Kotsioni, Rasha El-Habashy, Vivek Misra. 2001-2002.
Good Governance and the World Bank. University of
Oxford: research report.
Dwiyanto, Agus. 2008. Reformasi Birokrasi Publik di
Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Gendron, Yves, David J. Cooper, Barbara Townley. The
Construction of Auditing Expertise in Measuring
Government Performance. Journal of Accounting,
Organization, and Society. Volume 32, Issues 1–2,
January–February 2007. Pp 101–129.
Heinrich, Carolyn J. Outcomes-Based Performance
Management in the Public Sector:
Implications for Government Accountability and
Effectiveness. Public Administration Review. November/
December 2002 edition.
Hood, Christopher. 1995. The New Public Management
in the 1980s- Variation on a Theme. Journal Accounting
Organizations and Society. Oxford: Pergamon
Karim. Abdul Gaffar, et.al. 2003. Kompleksitas Persoalan
Otonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Kloot, Louise, John Martin. Strategic Performance
Management: a Balanced Approach to Performance
Management Issues in Local Government. Manage-
ment Accounting Research. 2000: 231-251
Kumorotomo. Wahyudi. 2008. Desentralisasi Fiskal.
Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Kuncoro, Sudrajat. 2002. Otonomi dan Pembangunan
Daerah. Jakarta: Erlangga
Kurniadi, Bayu Dardias. Desentralisasi Asimetris di Indonesia.
Paper presented at a Seminar held by Lembaga
Administrasi Negara, Jatinangor, 26 November 2012
Lembaga Administrasi Negara. 2006. Audit Kinerja
Pemerintah Daerah. Module: Anonim
Makhya, Syarief. 2010. Demokrasi Bermasalah (Catatan
Dinamika Politik Lampung).
Bandarlampung: Penerbit Universitas Lampung
Makhya, Syarief. 2013. Private Communication.
McNeil, Mary, Carmen Malena. 2010. Demanding Good
Governance: Lessons from Social Accountability Initiatives
in Africa. Washington: World Bank.
Moorhead, Gregory , and Ricky W. Griffin, 1995,
Organizational Behaviour, Boston
Houghton Mifflin Company
Nordholt, Henk Scholte, Gerry van Klinken. 2007.
Renegotiating Boundaries, Local Politics in Post Soeharto
Era. Leiden: KTILV Press.
Nutley, Sandra, and Osborne, Stephen P. 1994. The
Public Sector Management Handbook, Harlow: Longman
Pollit, Christopher. Performance Management in
Practice: A Comparative Study of Executive Agencies.
Journal of Public Administrative Research and Theory.
Oxford University Press. June, 2005.
Rashid, Ryaas. Kontroversi Kebijakan Baru Otonomi
Daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan (Journal of Govern-
ment Science). Number 16/ 2002 . Pp. 51-39.
Schachter, Hindy Lauer. Reinventing Government or
Reinventing Ourselves: Two Models for Improving
Government Performance. Public Administration
Review. Vol. 55, No. 6 (Nov. - Dec., 1995), pp. 530-537
Setiyono, Budi. 2005. Birokrasi dalam Perspektif Politik dan
Administrasi. Semarang: Pusat Kajian Otonomi Daerah
dan Kebijakan Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu
Politik Universitas Diponegoro
Setiyono, Budi. 2007. Pemerintahan dan Manajemen Sektor
Publik. Prinsip-Prinsip ManajemenPengelolaan Negara
Terkini. Jakarta: Kalam Nusantara.
Surbakti, Ramlan. Perubahan UU nomor 22 Tahun
Kapan, Apa dan Mengapa. Jurnal Ilmu
Pemerintahan (Journal of Government Science). Number
/ 2002. Pp. 41-51
Sutherland, Heather. 1983. Terbentuknya Sebuah Elit
Birokrasi (The Formation of
A Bureaucratic Elite). Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.
Tasrin, Kasmiyati. et.al. 2012. Kajian Pengembangan
Desentralisasi Asimetris. Jatinangor, Sumedang: Pusat
Kajian dan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Aparaturi.
Tolbert, Caroline J, Karen Mossberger. The Effects of E-
Government on Trust and Confidence in Govern-
ment. Public Administration Review. May-June, 2006.
Pp. 354-370.
Widodo, Kusumo. Meningkatkan Peran Serta Masyarakat
dalam Penerapan Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia.
Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan (Journal of Government Science).
Number 15/ 2002. Pp. 83-90.
Zethami, V.A., A. Parasuraman, and L.L. Berry. 1990.
Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions
and Expectations. New York: Free Press
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.