Responsibility of Digital-Based Complain Services at the Honor Board of Election Organizers of the Republic of Indonesia (DKPP RI) During Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.v13i2.13740Keywords:
Responsiveness, Complain, Public Service, DKPP, DigitizationAbstract
In public services, responsiveness or responsiveness is one of the benchmarks for good governance. Enforcement of the code of ethics against violations of election administration (KPU and Bawaslu) committed by the DKPP RI as an institution for enforcing the code of ethics for election organizers. Data from the DKPP stated that from 2018 to 2021 there were 1,546 complaints that came in through digital media, peaking in 2020 during the pandemic so that in the service of complaints carried out by the DKPP RI RI, it is necessary to have service responsiveness in receiving reports/complaints from reporters, which makes DKPP RI an institution that integrity. This research uses descriptive qualitative method with data analysis using NVivo 12 Plus. By using 6 indicators of responsiveness of the results obtained. The successful achievement of digital-based complaint services at the Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu Republik Indonesia (DKPP RI) during the pandemic uses 6 indicators, namely “the ability to respond to the community, officers have provided good attitudes and communication; speed of service, officers have shown alertness and sincerity in serving; accuracy of service, officers have been focused and serious in their work; service accuracy, officers have worked in accordance with the SOP; timeliness of service, officers work in accordance with incoming reports; the ability to respond to complaints, officers are able to respond to complaints and provide the best solutions.
References
Addink, Henk. 2019. Good Governance Concept and Context. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Albertson, Bethany, and Kimberly Guiler. 2020. “Conspiracy Theories, Election Rigging, and Support for Democratic Norms.” Research and Politics 7(3):1–9. doi: 10.1177/2053168020959859.
Atep Adya Brata. 2003. Dasar-Dasar Pelayanan Prima. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka.
Chukwuma, Anthony Ike. 2019. Quality Customer Service Key Strategies for Organisational Performance. United Kingdom: AuthorHouse.
DKPP RI. 2018. Laporan Kinerja Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia Tahun 2018. Jakarta: DKPP RI.
DKPP RI. 2019. Laporan Kinerja Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu 2019. Jakarta: DKPP RI.
DKPP RI. 2020. Laporan Kinerja Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia Tahun 2020. Jakarta: DKPP RI.
DKPP RI. 2021. Laporan Kinerja Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia Tahun 2021. Jakarta: DKPP RI.
Dunn, William N. 2003. Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadja Mada University Press.
Dwiyanto, Agus. 2021. Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: UGM PRESS.
Erwinsyahbana, Tengku. 2018. “Pelanggaran Kode Etik Dan Sanksi Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Umum.” INA-Rxiv Papers 6–8. doi: 10.31227/osf.io/gu59k.
Hardiyansyah. 2018. Kualitas Pelayanan Publik: Konsep, Dimensi, Indikator Dan Implementasinya. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.
Hennen, Leonhard, Ira van Keulen, Iris Korthagen, Georg Aichholzer, Ralf Lindner, and Rasmus Nielsen Øjvind. 2020. European E-Democracy in Practice.
Kasmir. 2006. Manajemen Perbankan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Liao, Yuguo. 2018. “Toward a Pragmatic Model of Public Responsiveness: Implications for Enhancing Public Administrators’ Responsiveness to Citizen Demands.” International Journal of Public Administration 41(2):159–69. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2016.1256305.
Lumbanraja, Anggita Doramia. 2020. “Urgensi Transformasi Pelayanan Publik Melalui E-Government Pada New Normal Dan Reformasi Regulasi Birokrasi.” Administrative Law & Governance Journal 3(2):220–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i2.220-231.
Lundmark, Sebastian, Henrik Oscarsson, and Marcus Weissenbilder. 2020. “Confidence in an Election Authority and Satisfaction with Democracy: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment of a Failed Election in Sweden.” Electoral Studies 67(8):102216. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102216.
Melani, Yayuk Ike. 2019. “Sistem Pengaduan Layanan Akademik Menggunakan Responsive Web Design.” SISFOKOM 08(01):39–45. doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v8i1.597.
Nugraha, Joko Tri. 2018. “E-Government Dan Pelayanan Publik (Studi Tentang Elemen Sukses Pengembangan E-Government Di Pemerintah Kabupaten Sleman).” Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Kajian Media 2(1):32–42. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.31002/jkkm.v2i1.758.
Nugroho, Alih Aji, Edy Sutrisno, and Rima Ranintya Yusuf. 2020. “Optimalisasi Layanan Kesehatan Melalui Inovasi Pelayanan Publik Proyek Perubahan Pelatihan Kepemimpinan.” SeTIA Mengabdi – Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 1(1):26–38.
Nurdin, Maharani. 2019. “Eksistensi Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu (DKPP) Dalam Penegakan Etika Penyelenggara Pemilu.” 5(2):1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.34005/veritas.v5i2.483.
Ocampo, Lanndon, Jovir Alinsub, Ruselle Anne Casul, Germellie Enquig, Mitzi Luar, Noche Panuncillon, Miriam Bongo, and Christine Omela Ocampo. 2019. “Public Service Quality Evaluation with SERVQUAL and AHP-TOPSIS: A Case of Philippine Government Agencies.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 68:1–32. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2017.12.002.
Santosa, Panji. 2010. Administrasi Publik. “Teori Dan Aplikasi Good Governance.” Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Sugandi, Yogi Suprayogi. 2011. Administrasi Publik Konsep Dan Perkembangan Ilmu Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Tangkilisan, Hassel Nogi S. 2005. Manajemen Publik. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Tun, Saw Khine Thet, Grichawat Lowatcharin, Peerasit Kumnuansilpa, and Charles David Crumpton. 2021. “Considering the Responsiveness, Accountability and Transparency Implications of Hybrid Organization in Local Governance: A Comparison of Public Service Provision Approaches in Myanmar and Thailand.” Asia-Pacific Social Science Review 21(2):125–42.
Verver, Hugo, Marino van Zelst, Gerardus Johannes Maria Lucas, and Marius Meeus. 2019. “Understanding Heterogeneity in the Performance Feedback – Organizational Responsiveness Relationship: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Peace Research 1–52. doi: 10.31219/osf.io/hq4uw.
Wahyudi, Very. 2018. “Politik Digital Di Era Revolusi Industri 4 .0 ‘ Marketing & Komunikasi Politik .’” Politea : Jurnal Politik Islam 1(2):149–68. doi: 10.20414/politea.v1i2.819.
Wardhani, Lita Tyesta Addy Listiya, Farid Ibrahim, and Adissya Mega Christia. 2020. “Koherensi Sistem Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Di Indonesia Terhadap Nilai-Nilai Demokrasi Pancasila.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 2(3):305–18. doi: 10.14710/jphi.v2i3.305-318.
Warjiyati, Sri. 2020. “Penataan Struktur Dan Kewenangan Komisi Pemilihan Umum, Badan Pengawas Pemilu Dan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Pemilihan Umum Yang Demokratis Di Indonesia.” Aristo 08(1):24–37. doi: 10.24269/ars.v8i1.2403.
Wati, Nila Kurnia. 2021. “Tipologi Inovasi Pelayanan Publik Dinas Kependudukan Dan Pencatatan Sipil (Disdukcapil) Kota Tangerang Selatan Di Masa Pandemi.” Jurnal of Government 6(2):89–110.
Widodo, Joko. 2007. Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Zulhalim, and Nurkhotimah. 2019. “Sistem Informasi Pengaduan Kode Etik Penyelengara Pemilu Pada Dewan Kehormatan Penyelengara Pemilu (DKPP).” 3(1):42–50.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.
