Factors Affecting Youth Voting Preferences in the Philippine Senatorial Election: A Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.123137Keywords:
candidate orientation, issue orientation, party identification, pre-election surveys, voting behavior, voting preferencesAbstract
The Philippine elections had been characterized by the presence of a weak party system, a low information environment for voters, a history of dynastic rule, and the preponderance of media celebrities in elected political offices. These features amounted to the observation that candidate winnability in the country is discussed often as a “personality versus platform’’ issue, highlighting the importance of candidates’ personal background. This study examines certain variables associated with the voting preferences of young educated voters for the 2019 Senatorial Elections. Using a quantitative approach, this inquiry specifically sought to analyze the extent to which party identification, issue orientation, candidate orientation, and pre-election surveys affect voters’ preferences for candidates. Survey data were obtained from the 210 purposively-sampled youth-voters, and were analyzed using structural equation modelling. On the whole, the results of the study indicate the positive association between the respondents’ party identification on voting preferences, as well as the positive association between pre-election surveys and the respondents’ voting preferences. Both issue orientation and candidate orientation do not appear as significant independent variables The outcome of the study has departed from the prevailing Philippine electoral trend where candidate personality-centered factors have been pivotal for explaining Filipino voting preferences.
References
Aardal, B. (2005). Issue voting. The European Voter, 28(3), 192-206. doi:10.1093/0199273219.003.0008
Adams, S., & Agomor, K. (2015). Democratic politics and voting behavior in Ghana. International Area Studies Review, 18(4), 365-381. doi:10.1177/2233865915587865
Aiba, J. (2002). Reviewing theories of voting behavior. Retrieved from http://repo.narau.ac.jp/modules/xoonips/download.php/AN00181569-20030300-1017.pdf?file_id=2035
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3)
Ando, H. (1969). A study of voting patterns in the Philippine presidential and senatorial elections, 1946-1965. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13(4), 567-586. doi:10.2307/2110072
Aragones, E., & Palfrey, T. (2004). The effect of candidate quality on electoral equilibrium: An experimental study. The American Political Science Review, 98(3), 77-90. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404001017
Arbuckle, J. L. (2016). IBM SPSS Amos 24 User’s Guide. (USA: IBM Corp. and Amos Development Corp.)
Baker, A., & Greene, K. (2015). Positional issue voting in Latin America. Retrieved from https://www.colorado.edu/faculty/baker/sites/default/files/attached-files/baker_and_greene_lav_website.pdf
Banerjee, A., & Pande, R. (2008). Parochial politics: Ethnic preferences and politician corruption. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1136706
Barclay, D. W., & Smith, J. B. (1997). The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(1). 3–21.
Belanger, E., & Meguids, B. (2008). Issue salience, issue ownership and issue-based vote choice: Evidence from Canada. Electoral Studies, 27(2), 477-491. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.001
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107. 238–246.
Biswas, A., Ingle, N., & Roy, M. (2014). Influence of social media on voting behavior. Retrieved from http://jppgnet.com/journals/jppg/Vol_2_No_2_June_2014/7.pdf
Blais, A., Gidengil, E., & Nevitte, N. (2002). Do polls influence the vote. Retrieved from https://www.press.umich.edu/pdf/0472099213-ch11.pdf
Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 17. 303–316.
Byrne, G. C., & Peuschel, J. K. (1974). But who shall I vote for county coroner? Journal of Politics, 36, 778–784. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 2129255
Calda, D. (2016). The voting preferences of selected voters in the city of Calapan for 2016 national and local elections: a descriptive study. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/25598774/THE_VOTING_PREFERENCES_OF_SELECTED_VOTERS_IN_THE_CITY_OF_CALAPAN_FOR_2016_NATIONAL_AND_LOCAL_ELECTIONS_A_DESCRIPTIVE_STUDY
Campbell, A., Gurin, D. and Miller, W.E. (1954). The voter decides. The American Political Science Review, 49, 225-228. doi: 10.2307/1951650
Centeno, D. (2010). Celebrification in Philippine politics: Exploring the relationship between celebrity endorser's parasociability and the public's voting behavior [Abstract]. Social Science Diliman, 6 (5), 66-75. Retrieved from http://journaldatabase.info/articles/celebrification_philippine_politics_exploring.html
Chin, W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (pp. 295-358). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cutler, F. (2002). The simplest shortcut of all: Sociodemographic characteristics and electoral Choice. The Journal of Politics, 64(2), 466-490. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2691857
Dahlgaard, J., Hansen, J., Hansen, K., & Larsen, M. (2017). How election polls shape voting behavior. Scandinavian Political Studies, 40(5), 330-343. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.12094
David, C., & Legara, E. (2015). How voters combine candidates on the ballot: The case of the Philippine senatorial elections. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(3), 70-94. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edv041
Donsbach, W. (2001). Who’s afraid of election polls? Normative and empirical arguments for the freedom of pre-election surveys. Retrieved from https://wapor.org/wp-content/uploads/who-is-afraid-of-opinion-polls.pdf
Fishbein, M., & Coombs, F. S. (1974). Basis for decision: An attitudinal analysis of voting behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4(2), 95-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1974.tb00662.x
Gallardo, R. (2015). The Filipino vote. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/19545321/The_Filipino_Vote
Garzia, D., & Viotti, F. (2012). Party identification, leader effects and vote choice in Italy, 1990-2008. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270267583_Party_Identification_Leader_Effects_and_Vote_Choice_in_Italy_1990-2008
Green, A. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1npp6m
Green, J., & Hobolt, S. (2008). Owning the issue agenda: Party strategies and vote choices in British elections. Electoral Studies, 27, 460-476. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2008.02.003
Hazarika, B. (2015). Voting behavior in India and its determinants. Retrieved from http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jhss/papers/Vol20-issue10/Version-4/E0201042225.pdf
Hardy, B. (2014). Candidate traits and political choice. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199793471-e-017
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. & Sinkovics, R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing 20. 277-320
Horiuchi, Y., Smith, D., & Yamamoto, T. (2016). Identifying voter preferences for politicians’ personal attributes: A conjoint experiment in Japan. Retrieved from https://rubenson.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Horiuchi-Smith-Yamamoto.pdf
Hossain, K., Islam, S., & Aktar, M. (2017). People’s voting behavior in local election: A study on Annadanagar Union Parishad, Pirgachha, Rangpur. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22, 1-14. doi:10.9790/0837-2203010114
Kinder, D. & Abelson, R. (1981). Presidential prototypes [Abstract]. Political Behavior, 02(3), 315-337. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/586418
Kittilson, M. (2016). Gender and political behavior. Retrieved from http://politics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-71
Klein, D., & Baum, L. (2001). Ballot information and voting decisions in judicial elections. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 709–728. Retrieved from http://www. jstor.org/-stable/449231
Kriesi, H., & Sciarini, P. (2004). The Impact of Issue Preferences on Voting Choices in the Swiss Federal Elections, 1999. British Journal of Political Science, 04, 725-747. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123404210262
Lachat, R. (2006). Party identification, electoral utilities, and voting choice. Retrieved from http://www.romain-lachat.ch/papers/ecpr2006.pdf
Lau, R. and Redlawsk, D. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making [Abstract]. American Journal of Political Science, 45:4, 951–971. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2669334
Lawrence, D. (1978). Candidate orientation, vote choice, & the quality of the American electorate. Polity, 11, 229-246. doi:10.2307/3234444
Lee, D. (2001). The electoral advantage to incumbency and voters' valuation of politicians' experience: A regression discontinuity analysis of close elections. Retrieved from http://cle.berkeley.edu/wp/wp31.pdf
Lenz, G. (2012). Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77, 637-640. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nft014
Liu, N. (2007). Party identification, candidate evaluation, and voting in Taiwan’s presidential elections, 1996-2004. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228961408_Party_Identification_Candidate_Evaluation_and_Voting_in_Taiwan's_Presidential_Elections_1996-2004
Markel, D. (2010). Out and running: Gay and lesbian candidates, elections, and policy representation. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2tt34x
Marsh, C. (1985). Back on the bandwagon: The effect of opinion polls on public opinion [Abstract]. British Journal of Political Science, 15, 51-74. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/193747
McAllister, I. (2016). Candidates and Voting Choice. Retrieved from http://politics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-73?print=pdf
Meffert, M., Gschwend, T., Huber, S., & Pappi, F. (2011). More than wishful thinking: causes and consequences of voters’ electoral expectations about parties and coalitions. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228460619_More_Than_Wishful_Thinking_Causes_and_Consequences_of_Voters'_Electoral_Expectations_About_Parties_and_Coalitions
Mehr, H., Rothschild, D., Goel, S., & Gelman, A. (2018). Disentangling bias and variance in election polls. Retrieved from https://5harad.com/papers/polling-errors.pdf
Meier, K. (1975). Party identification and vote choice: The causal relationship. The Western Political Quarterly, 28, 496-505. doi:10.2307/447369
Michniewicz, K., & Vandello, J. (2013). The attractive underdog: When disadvantage bolsters attractiveness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 942-952. doi:10.1177/0265407513477629
Miller, W. (1991). Party identification realignment and party voting: Back to the basics. The American Political Science Review, 85, 557-568. doi:10.2307/1963175
Miller, W., & Shanks, M. (1996). The new American voter. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 27, 383-386. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27551745
Murcia, J., & Bolo, R. (2017). Millennial voters’ preference for the 2016 Philippine presidential elections: A simulation using conjoint analysis. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317594783_Millennial_Voters'_Preference_for_the_2016_Philippine_Presidential_Elections_A_Simulation_Using_Conjoint_Analysis
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Patinio, F. (2018). Statistics of youth voters in the Philippines. Retrieved from statistics of youth voters in the philippines (bingj.com)
Pertierra, R. (1988). Religion, politics, and rationality in a Philippine community. Manila, Philippines: Ateneo de Manila University Press
Pitkin, H. (1972). The concept of representation. Retrieved from https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520021563/the-concept-of-representation
Popkin, S. (1994). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Contemporary Sociology, 21, 26-46. doi:10.2307/2075855
Ranney, A. (1999). Governing: An introduction to political science (7th ed.). Singapore: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Rosenberg, S., Bohan, L., McCafferty, P. and Harris, K. (1986). The image and the vote: The effect of candidate presentation on voter preference [Abstract]. American Journal of Political Science, 30:1, 108–127. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2111296
Roskin, M., Cord, R., Medeiros, J., & Jones, W. (1997). Political Science: An introduction (6th ed.). New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall.
Sarlamanov, K. and Jovanoski, A. (2014). Models of voting. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308918563_MODELS_OF_VOTING
Simon, H. (1954). Bandwagon and underdog effects and the possibility of election predictions [Abstract]. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 18, 245-253. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2745982.
Social Weather Station. (2007). Attitudes towards political parties in the Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.kas.de/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=23203435-2db4-47da-0e59-ffa1efc041fb&groupId=252038
Stolwijk, S., Schuck, A., & De Vreese, C. (2016). How anxiety and enthusiasm help explain the bandwagon effect [Abstract]. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29, 554-574. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw018
Ufen, A. (2008). Political party and party system institutionalization in Southeast Asia: Lessons for democratic consolidation in Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand. The Pacific Review, 21, 327-350. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740802134174
Urbach, N. & Ahlemann, F. (2010). Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 11(2). 5-40
Van der Meer, T., Hakhverdian, A., & Aaldering, L. (2016). Off the fence, onto the bandwagon? A large-scale survey experiment on effect of real-life poll outcomes on subsequent vote intentions [Abstract]. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 28, 46-72. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edu041
Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J., & Tresch, A. (2017). Position, competence, and commitment. The three dimensions of issue voting. Retrieved from https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/b84237e8-d8f7-4bfa-82ff-705c8278160f.pdf
Yu, C. (2004). Direction and strength of voter’s party identification in Taiwan after 2000. Retrieved from http://www2.scu.edu.tw/politics/journal/doc/j19/2.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.
