A Comparative Political Analysis Between the New Order Regime and The Reformed Era in Indonesia: A Case Study of Oligarchy Politics in the Mining Industry of East Kalimantan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.103105Keywords:
New Order, Reformed Era, Oligarchy, DemocratizationAbstract
This study analyzes and discusses the democratization of the political oligarchy circle in assessing comparative political oligarchy between the new order (ORBA) and the reformed regime. The authors used a literature review method, which is through journals and reports that associate the goal of this research and had descriptively designed the study through data obtained from the said sources. Findings generated in this study are the comparison between the state of political oligarchy in the new era and the post-reform era. Seen over time, the democratization process increasingly shows a paradoxical situation. It illustrates that the political dynamics and democratic freedoms of citizens are being controlled, as a reflection of perplexed democracy perceived with detachment during the New Order authoritarian regime. Political actors also have taken advantage of the transition building a consolidated political force and repositioning itself into a storefront network of governmental power. However, the transition process aided the rise of a black-market democracy – entrepreneur oligarchs whose hunger for political power and wealth brought them to control the growth and direction of democracy. A problem that this research wants to examine.
References
Aspinall, E. (2015). The Surprising Democratic Behemoth: Indonesia in Comparative Asian Perspective. The Journal of Asian Studies, 74(4), 889–902. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911815001138
Aspinall, E., & Fealy, G. (Eds.). (2010). Soeharto’s New Order and Its Legacy: Essays in honour of Harold Crouch (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.22459/SNOL.08.2010
Bathoro, A., & Kosandi, M. (2017). Emergence of Military-Based Oligarchy in Reformation Era (The Case Study of Rivalry between SBY and Luhut B Pandjaitan in the Nationalization of PT Inalum). https://doi.org/10.2991/icaspgs-icbap-17.2017.35
Carnegie, P. J. (2009). Democratization and Decentralization in Post-Soeharto Indonesia: Understanding Transition Dynamics. Pacific Affairs, 81(4), 515–525.
Cassinelli, C. W. (1953). The Law of Oligarchy. American Political Science Review, 47(3), 773–784. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952904
Ford, M., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2014). Beyond Oligarchy: Wealth, Power and Contemporary Indonesian Politics. Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications, (180), 4.
Hadiz, V. R. (2004). The rise of neo-Third Worldism? the Indonesian trajectory and the consolidation of illiberal democracy. Third World Quarterly, 25(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000185336
Lay, C. (2012). Democratic Transition in Local Indonesia: An Overview of Ten Years Democracy. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 15, 13.
Moleong, Lexy J. (2012). Qualitative Research Methodology. Bandung: PT Young Rosdakarya.
Slater, D., & Simmons, E. (2010). Informative Regress: Critical Antecedents in Comparative Politics. Comparative Political Studies, 43(7), 886–917. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010361343
Tahir, A., Bachri, S., Ruslan, A., & Abdullah, F. (2015). The Local Election and Local Politic in Emboding the Democracy. 9.
Winters, J. A. (2013). Oligarchy and Democracy in Indonesia. Southeast Asia Program Publications at Cornell University, 96(Wealth, Power, and Contemporary Indonesian Politics), 11–33.
Website
https://www.jatam.org/category/publikasi/produk-pengetahuan/buku/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.