Jokowi’s Loyal Opposition: Analysis of the Model of the Possibility of the Prosper Justice Party to the GovernMent (2014- 2021)

Authors

  • IN’AMUL MUSTOFA Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • TITIN PURWANINGSIH Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • RIDHO AL HAMDI Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.v14i1.16431

Keywords:

election, loyal opposition, PKS, presidential model

Abstract

After the 2014 general election and through 2021, the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS) decided to become the executive power’s loyal opposition under President Joko Widodo. PKS’s decision to join an opposition party resulted in a substantial increase in its vote total, from 6.79% in the 2014 election to 8.21% in the 2019 election. There are hints that PKS intends to replicate the strategy employed by the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP), which be- came President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono’s opposition during his two terms in office and won the 2014 election. Using secondary data and qualitative descriptive analysis, this study examines the model and pattern of PKS opposition to the Jokowi administration between 2014 and 2021. This study’s findings indicate that the relationship model between PKS and the government is cooperative rather than antagonistic. As an opposition party under a presidential system, PKS works as a balancer and controller of power through selective rather than universal criticism of government policies and performance.

References

Anastaplo, G. (2004). Loyal Opposition in a Modern Democracy. 35, 13.

Aspinall, E., Fossati, D., Muhtadi, B., & Warburton, E. (2018). Mapping the Indonesian political spectrum. 8.

Brack, N., & Weinblum, S. (2011). “Political Opposition”: Towards a Renewed Research Agenda. 1, 11.

Budiman, A. (2021). Gelar Rakernas 2021, PKS Tegaskan Sikap Jadi Oposisi. Tempo. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1437619/gelar-rakernas-2021-pks-tegaskan-sikap- jadi-oposisi

Dahl, R. A. (1965). Reflections on Opposition in Western Democracies. Government and Opposition, 1(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1965.tb00362.x

Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy. Yale University Press.

Detik. (2014). PKS Ingin Seperti PDIP, 10 Tahun Oposisi Lalu Jadi Pemenang Pilpres. Detik. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-2696654/pks-ingin-seperti-pdip-10-tahun- oposisi-lalu-jadi-pemenang-pilpres

Duile, T. (2021). Challenging Hegemony: Nurhadi-Aldo and the 2019 Election in Indone- sia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 51(4), 537–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00472336.2020.1748896

Erdianto, K. (2019). Mungkinkah-hanya-pks-yang-bertahan-jadi-oposisi-pemerintahan- jokowi? Ko m pas. https://nasional.kom pas.com/read/2019/06/29/19452401/ mungkinkah-hanya-pks-yang-bertahan-jadi-oposisi-pemerintahan- jokowi?page=all

Fatah, Eep Saefullah. (1999).Membangun Oposisi: Agenda-Agenda Perubahan Politik Masa Depan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Gabrillin, A. (2015). Presiden PKS: Kami Ini Oposisi Loyal Artikel ini telah tayang di Kompas.com dengan judul “Presiden PKS: Kami Ini Oposisi Loyal”, Klik untuk baca: Https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2015/09/14/21153731/Presiden.PKS.Kami.Ini.Op o- sisi.Lo yal. Kom pas. https://nasional. kom pas.com/read/201 5/09/14/21153731/ Presiden.PKS.Kami.Ini.Oposisi.Loyal

Garritzmann, J. L. (2017). How much power do oppositions have? Comparing the oppor- tunity structures of parliamentary oppositions in 21 democracies. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 23(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2017.1283913

Indonesia, C. (2021). Gelar Rakernas, PKS Mantapkan Sikap Oposisi ke Pemerintah. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20210317181043-32-618794/gelar-rakernas-pks-mantapkan-sikap-oposisi-ke-pemerintah

Lidwina, A. (2019). DPR Dikuasai Partai Koalisi Jokowi. Katadata. https:// databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2019/10/25/parlemen-dikuasai-partai-koalisi- jokowi

Lijphart, A. (1989). From the politics of accommodation to adversarial politics in the Neth- erlands: A reassessment. West European Politics, 12(1), 139–153. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01402388908424727

McGill, J, & Soetrisno, E. (1996). McGill, J. & Soetrisno, E. Kamus Politik. Aribu Matra Mandiri.

Muhtadi, B. (2015). Jokowi’s First Year: A Weak President Caught between Reform and Oligarchic Politics. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 51(3), 349–368. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1110684

Munadi. (2019). Oposisi dan Koalisi: Potret Kultur Demokrasi Indonesia. 2(1), 1 –20. Munadi. (2019). Oposisi dan Koalisi: Potret Kultur Demokrasi Indonesia. Resolusi: Jurnal

Sosial Politik. https://doi.org/10.32699/resolusi.v2i1.726

Noor, F. (2016). OPOSISI DALAM KEHIDUPAN DEMOKRASI: ARTI PENTING KEBERADAAN OPOSISI SEBAGAI BAGIAN PENGUATAN DEMOKRASI DI INDONESIA. 17.

Pizzimenti, E. (2017). The evolution of party funding in Italy: A case of inclusive cartelisation? Modern Italy, 22(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/mit.2016.40

PKS.ID. (2016). PKS: Program Jokowi-JK yang Baik Didukung, Jelek Dikoreksi. https://www.pks.id/content/pks-program-jokowi-jk-yang-baik-didukung-jelek-dikoreksi

Sindonews.com. (2020). PKS Tolak RUU HIP Karena Bertentangan Dengan Sumber Falsafah Negara dan Mengabaikan TAP MPRS XXV/1966. https://fraksi.pks.id/2020/05/13/pks-tolak-ruu-hip-karena-bertentangan-dengan- sumber-falsafah-negara-dan-mengabaikan-tap-mprs-xxv-1966/

Skilling, H. G. (1967a). The Party , Opposition and Interest Groups: Fifty Years of Continu- ity and Change.

Skilling, H. G. (1967b). The Party, Opposition and Interest Groups: Fifty Years of Continu- ity and Change. International Journal, 22(4), 618. https://doi.org/10.2307/40200201

Slater. (n.d.).

Slater, D. (2018). PARTY CARTELIZATION, INDONESIAN-STYLE: PRESIDENTIAL POWER- SHARING AND THE CONTINGENCY OF DEMOCRATIC OPPOSITION. Journal of

East Asian Studies, 18(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2017.26

Slater, D., & Simmons, E. (2012). Promiscuous Powersharing in Indonesia and Bolivia.

Comparative Political Studies, 28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012453447 Studies, E. A. (2018). Dan Slater PARTY CARTELIZATION , INDONESIAN-STYLE/ : PRESI-

DENTIAL POWER-SHARING AND THE. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2017.26

Tempo.co. (2017). Perpu Ormas Disahkan, Berikut Aturan Krusial yang Dipersoalkan. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1027623/perpu-ormas-disahkan-berikut-aturan- krusial-yang-dipersoalkan

Tempo.co. (2019). Ketua DPR Targetkan RUU PKS Disahkan Sebelum Pemilu. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1174618/ketua-dpr-targetkan-ruu-pks-disahkan- sebelum-pemilu

Tempo.co. (2020). PKS Tolak RUU HIP Masuk Prolegnas Prioritas 2021, Sebab....

https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1406321/pks-tolak-ruu-hip-masuk-prolegnas- prioritas-2021-sebab

Tirto.id. (2017). F-PKS Usul Revisi Terbatas UU Ormas daripada Terima Perppu". https://tirto.id/f-pks-usul-revisi-terbatas-uu-ormas-daripada-terima-perppu-cyyd

Tuswoyo. (2012). Oposisi Dalam Sistem Presidensial: Sepenggal Pengalaman PDI Perjuangan (PDIP) Di Era Pemerintahan SBY-JK. Masyarakat Indonesia, 38(2).

Tuswoyo. (2016). Peran Partai Oposisi di Parlemen Pasca Pemilu Presiden 2014. Jurnal Politik, 1(2).

Wijanarko, B. (2015). Temui Jokowi, PKS Tegaskan Sebagai Oposisi Loyal. CNN Indone- sia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20151221175612-32-99680/temui- jokowi-pks-tegaskan-sebagai-oposisi-loyal

Downloads

Published

2023-02-17