Acting Performance Evaluation Governor of Aceh in 2022 Based on Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) : Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), Acting Governor of Aceh: Achmad Marzuki, Strategic Policy, Strategic Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18196/jsp.v15i1.350Keywords:
Performance Evaluation, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), Acting Governor of AcehAbstract
This research seeks to prove the hypothesis regarding the performance of the Acting Governor of Aceh using the framework of Key Performance Indicators. The measurement variables for the Main Performance Indicators are Adaptability to Change, Financial Management, Infrastructure Development, Public Service, and Stakeholder Satisfaction. Since June 2022, Aceh Province has become a new chapter of leadership after the Helsinki MoU from the Military, this is in contrast to the message of the struggle, that the Military has a place in the hearts of the Acehnese people. So the presence of the military in the Aceh leadership system is interesting to study from its performance during its tenure. This research uses a quantitative descriptive method with data sources from questionnaires via Google Forms with 100 respondents, and data processing is carried out using Smart PLS software. The results of this research show an R Square value of 0.705, thus it can be concluded that 70.5% of the variation in the performance of the Acting Governor of Aceh can be explained by the independent variables in the regression model. R Square identifies quality in the form of strong/medium/weak categories. Several KPI variables that have a significant influence on the performance of the Acting Governor of Aceh are financial management, public service, and stakeholder satisfaction, with P Values of 0.011, 0.020, and 0.035, with these results the performance of the Acting Governor of Aceh was successful in achieving the Main Performance Indicators. Meanwhile, the variables adaptability to change and infrastructure development with P values of 0.405 and 0.343 do not have a significant effect on the performance of the Acting Governor of Aceh on the KPI Indicators.
References
Abdullah, M. (2015). METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF. In Aswaja Pressindo. Aswaja Pressindo.
Agustin, R. D., & Subardjo, A. (2017). Konsep value for money dalam mengukur kinerja pelayanan sektor publik. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset …, 6. http://jurnalmahasiswa.stiesia.ac.id/index.php/jira/article/download/1241/1259
Aramide, K. A., Jacob, U. S., & Pillay, J. (2023). Conceptualisation and Contextualisation of Mixed-Methods Research: A Review. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 8(4), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2023.31
Arvianto, A., Handayani, N. U., & Saptadi, S. (2018). PENGEMBANGAN INDIKATOR KINERJA UTAMA UNTUK MENGUKUR KEBERLANJUTAN PENELITIAN PADA FAKULTAS TEKNIK UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 2(2), 263–274.
Budi Hartono, S., Zaenuri, W., & Mutiara Savitri. (2021). Alokasi Anggaran, Intellectual Capital, Kinerja Keuangan, Dan Indikator Kinerja Utama Badan Layanan Umum. JIAFE (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi), 07(01), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.34204/jiafe.v7i1.2915
Firmansyah, M., Masrun, M., & Yudha S, I. D. K. (2021). Esensi Perbedaan Metode Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif. Elastisitas - Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 3(2), 156–159. https://doi.org/10.29303/e-jep.v3i2.46
Halik, A. (2014). Kajian Pengembangan Kebijakan Pelayanan Terpadu Satu Pintu (PTSP) Melalui Perspektif Indikator Kinerja Utama (IKU). Jurnal Bina Praja, 06(01), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.06.2014.41-50
Hidayat, I., Tolago, A. I., Dako, R. D. R., & Ilham, J. (2023). Analisis Data Eksploratif Capaian Indikator Kinerja Utama 3 Fakultas Teknik. Jambura Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 5(2), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.37905/jjeee.v5i2.18397
Juarisman, R., Tua, H., & Yusri, A. (2020). Evaluasi Kinerja Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 16(1), 163–173.
Kuntadi, C., & Puspita, G. C. (2022). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Pelaksanaan Anggaran Pada Kementerian/Lembaga: Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja, Dukungan Organisasi dan Faktor Individual. Jurnal Ilmu Manajamen Terapan, 4(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.31933/jimt.v4i2
Lumempow, V., Posumah, J. H., & Kolondam, H. F. (2021). Evaluasi Kinerja Pemerintah Desa Dalam Menjalankan Tugas Dan Fungsi (Studi di Desa Kotamenara Kecamatan Amurang Timur Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan). Jap, VII(103), 38–49.
Nasir, & Sukmawati. (2023). Analysis of Research Data Quantitative and Qualitative. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(1), 368–373. https://ummaspul.e-journal.id/maspuljr/article/view/5488
Nursi, M., Darwianis, D., & Wirnita, W. (2023). Implementation of the Merdeka Learning Policy on the Main Performance Indicators (MPI) of Higher Education. Jurnal Cerdas Proklamator, 11(1), 120–126.
Pentang, J. T. (2023). Quantitative Research Instrumentation for Educators. Lecture Series on Research Process and Publication, March.
Permendagri. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penjabat Gubernur, Penjabat Bupati, Dan Penjabat Wali Kota. Berita Negara Republik Indonesia, 310, 1–12. https://peraturan.go.id/files/permendagri-no-4-tahun-2023.pdf
Radyanto, M. R., & Prihastono, E. (2020). Pengembangan Sistem Pendampingan Usaha Berkelanjutan Bagi UMKM Berbasis Sistem Manajemen Kinerja. Opsi, 13(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.31315/opsi.v13i1.3467
Rahmadoni, F., & Erwandi. (2018). Evaluasi Atas Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Berbasis Hasil. JEM : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Manajemen STIE Pertiba Pangkalpinang, 4(1), 53–69.
Rahmawati, S. I. (2019). Pengukuran Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah Kabuaten Sidoarjo Dengan Menggunakan Prinsip Value for Money. Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi, 8, 1–16.
Sidabutar, I. (2018). Perancangan Sistem Informasi Capaian Kinerja Pegawai Berdasarkan Indikator Kinerja Utama Berbasis Web Dengan Metode Prototype (Studi Kasus Bidang Dp3 Kanwil Djp Sumatera Utara I). CTIS : Computer Technology and Information Systems, 2(1), 1–10.
Siddiqi, A. (2018). Disasters in conflict areas: finding the politics. Disasters, 42, S161–S172. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12302
Sinulingga, A. A., Halim, A., & Nasir, P. E. (2020). Bencana dan Konflik: Pelajaran dari Aceh dan Sri Lanka. Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS), 9(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.25077/ajis.9.1.203-217.2020
Sumanti, R. (2020). Upaya Peningkatan Kapabilitas Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP) di Aceh Melalui Internal Audit Capability Model (IACM). Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 16(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v16i2.654
Susilana, R. (2015). Metode Penelitian Sosial Kuantitatif. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing, 11(3), 287–301.
Ulimpa, Y. S., Sondakh, J. J., & Runtu, T. (2018). Analisis Pengukuran Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Era Otonomi Daerah Di Kabupaten Sorong Provinsi Papua Barat. Going Concern : Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 14(1), 302–307. https://doi.org/10.32400/gc.13.04.21105.2018
Wuri, Risto, R., Kaunang, Markus, Pioh, & Revlie, N. (2017). KINERJA APARATUR PEMERINTAH DESA DALAM MENINGKATKAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK (Studi di Desa Sinsingon Kecamatan Passi Timur Kabupaten Bolaang Mongondow). Jurnal Eksekutif, 1(1), 107–115.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Chaidir Ali, Dian Eka Rahmawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license.
